Robert Entman

Like I aforementioned, a black face at the desk does not guarantee that black humanity anchors the analysis.

So how does this framework? How did I come to build and create the Sports Crit Media Framing Theory? Robert Entman.

He explains that framing through selection and salience, this is communication, highlights only aspects of realities in ways that really shape problems, define those problems, causal explanations, moral judgments, and proposed responses.

Sound a lot like what Robinson was doing.

But I think where the frames come in and to kind of more define it in terms of especially being like the conversational of like, I'm deeming this as sacred and framing in a very loose term of like specific, like physical frames or just the framing of positioning and artwork in a gallery space or on the wall or in a space of like spotlight and of importance.

I was referred to the work of Robert Entman and he's in one of his essays talking about framing.

He says that framing essentially involves selection and salience and he's talking about framing and writing like in the context of cold war literature but he talks about to frame is to select some aspects of a perceived reality make them more salient in a communicating text in such a way as to promote a particular problem definition casual interpretation moral evaluation and and or treatment recommendation for the item described.

And I feel like my work falls into kind of the latter of the treatment recommendation for the item described and talking about attention.