Reckless Fireweaver

Mm-hmm.

And outside of that, any other large mana thing you're paying off, it's like Ulamaz Crusher or your standard big mana payoffs for any common format.

And then you've got the backup of the backup, where if you're not commander damaging, if you're not doing the big creature payoff, you're going into your Reckless Fireweavers, because I've got one, two, three, four of those in the deck?

Five of those?

Mm-hmm.

okay

well no i guess that's not true no yeah some sometimes they do make deck building decisions based on how to seem like an innocent bystander and position myself yes like that's that's Xiaojun's whole thing right like Xiaojun the entire process of deck building for Xiaojun like the reason that I'm not on like Reckless Fireweaver or like Ingenious Artillerist is because when you play those cards you become the threat and people start pointing their removal at you but as long as you're just like yeah well here's my commander she's just going to do one or two damage to you each turn also you shouldn't kill me because i'm gonna i'm solving the problems i'm gonna like i have the counter spells i have the removal i'm gonna prevent the combo deck from winning i'm your friend please send gut skeletons somewhere else like as long as you're right like that's that is in fact a deck building decision that i made so this is double extra fascinating that you you bring it up here Yeah, I had never thought about

implementing pillar philosophy at the table.

Right.

I mean, look, you're in red.

Everyone knows, like, Westalker Ardent and Reckless, uh, Reckless Fireweaver and all those adjacent things.

Yeah.

So, like, this is a way for you to get that extra little bit of damage out, and the extra bit of treasures out of it.

When another villain and or artifact you control enters, this creature deals one damage to target opponent.

So it's similar to Reckless Fireweaver.

It's not hitting everyone.

It's hitting one person.