Racial profiling

I'd like to highlight that our colleague, Justice Abonsawin, is sitting remotely today.

I must also note from the very beginning that this case is not one of racial profiling.

In the initial, initial request and in the questions asked to the witness and during the trial, there were no suggestions or trace of any racial profiling in the police intervention.

It was not mentioned during the appeal either.

The respondent says that his reaction could have been due to his pus-- his being part of a racial minority, but...

Mr. Fitzgerald, will you talk to us-- Well, you're going to talk to us, of course, about your interpretation of the McDonald decision and if it should be set aside or not.

When it comes to reasonable doubt-- uh, reasonable suspicion rather, the first judge said that there was no prof-- uh, racial profiling, but will you talk to us about the possible impact of reasonable suspicion standards on racial profiling? Answer: Yes, absolutely, I will talk about it.

The standard that we propose allows us to, uh, reduce this risk.

Now what? I'm just curious.

He keeps repeating this racial profiling thing.

Why? Even if she did whatever he's going to allege here.

Why would it be racial profiling? It's very obvious that it has nothing to do with this guy's race.

He's a black man.

It has nothing to do with that.

The store manager doesn't like the dog being off a leash.

How does that equate to racial profiling?