Phronesis

Scott says that it descends from the classical Greek and denotes the knowledge that can come only from practical experience.

Phronesis, practical wisdom.

Matisse is the knowledge that comes from that.

He contrasts it with episteme and techne, which are the kinds of knowledge that can be written down, taught from a book, verified by a stranger, like math, right? Science.

This is especially clear in the translation of that Hebrew phrase chokhmat elohim, or divine wisdom, as either Sophia or phronesis in the Septuagint or as epistemon in other texts.

As these terms have a significant linguistic valence, Sophia can refer to a wide range of literary and poetic skills, knowledge of nature and divine matters, to specific philosophical wisdom.

Phronesis, on the other hand, most often has the sense of practical knowledge in politics and otherwise, while epistemon often has a more technical or sometimes even theoretical sense, depending on how it's coming from people like Aristotle.

Further, the sections of 1 Kings 5, when rendered into Greek, expand upon the sense of proverbs and songs in the Hebrew to a different semantic range in Greek, parabolas and odai.

which also carry astrological and magical valences in Greek that don't really occur in the original Hebrew.