Peshat

for such a case yeah then why did I see such a possibility in my dream about sharing Torah with someone who doesn't know anything he says you received that message so you can go tell Rava that he did wrong so he said well wouldn't it have been better if Rava would have had such a dream if it was a message intended for Rava Rava was because he acted and therefore who's angry at him so he's not talking to him He didn't want to show it to him in that dream.

That's how Rashi understands in the second Pshat, which Rashi thinks is the Iker Pshat, that it was because of this Maisa that Rava was nuzzled in Shemayim.

Rashi in the first Pshat relates this to a different Gemara, that Rava was nuzzled based on the Sugi and Tainestav Chavdalit, that there was a person who was Chayiv Malkus and Rava was bathed in, and they gave him Malkus and he died.

And Shavar Malka wanted to punish and be Mitzah of Rava because he killed someone who was bathed in, So the mother of Sharmalka said not to get involved with the Jewish people, because HaKadosh Baruch Hu listens to the tefillos of the Jewish people.

And in order to demonstrate that, she asked Ravit to be mespalel, that rain would come down in the middle of the summer, Chodesh Tamuz.

V'lam hal'sehi, furthermore, says the Gemara, the Halakha is that one may give the Matnos Kehuna to a Kohen who's not such an expert, as we find the Tanya, as we learn in a braisa, she'me od ba'avoda.

A Kohen who doesn't believe, Rashis Pshat, that doesn't believe Hakadosh Baruch Hu is the one that told us to bring K-Korbanos.

He's, he believes that Moshe Rabbeinu came up with this idea of Korbanos all by himself.

The Rivvo does not agree with this Pshat.

He says, somebody who doesn't believe that all the Torah is from the Shamayim, somebody who believes that Moshe Rabbeinu made this up all by himself is a kofer baker.

And if somebody, Rachmanah Litzlan, is a kofer baker, he's certainly disqualified from receiving Matnos K-Kehuna.

They were only a mitzvah.

It's a nice thing to do.

He had a limited understanding.

But what's the Pashti? What is this Pashti referring to? The Pshat is that this Pashti is speaking about someone who is teaching God's song to someone who has a bad heart.

Which means teaching a Talmud who is of bad character.

There's a balance over here.

So we'll we'll just note that it'll say that later on.

there shall not be a foreign god among you and you shall not bow down to an alien god now we said there shall not be a foreign god in you because that's the Hebrew and then the Radak actually does bring down the Drasha that Pshat means it's among you but the Drasha is on in you so I actually like in you better for that reason I think it wanted to go with the Pshat over the Midrash for the Radak so the difference i'll tell you a spoiler alert um anyone know do we say i guess we didn't say this last time who is the god that is in you is the ishara yeah right so so and a lot of them apart from bringing that down even though it's shockingly like i mean i don't think it's shot but you know it's the drusha

sorry

yeah okay um okay yeah

Someone sees oil in a dream, they can reveal to him secrets of Torah.

Now, of course, the push of the Pshat in this Gemara, the push of the Pshat in this Gemara, is that when you squeeze oil, juice out of an apple, that's apple juice.

It's the apple, the juice of the apple.

But when you squeeze wine out of a grape, or oil out of an olive, we don't say that that's grape juice or olive juice.

It's not two disconnected things.

What's happening in Pshat and what's happening in Sod are not two separate things.

The inner plumbing of something is what leads to what comes out when you open, when you turn the faucet.

So what we see coming out is Bimam al-Hashem.

That's Usham.

So number one, like what does Usham mean to every play? So I like the Pshat of the Rizvahs in this case, not the play motion of the court.

They say, oh, it's a Suffolk.

You're not sure.