Skip to main content
Perry Anderson

Perry Anderson

British philosopher and historianWikipedia

Search complete. 10 mentions across 7 episodes found for "Perry Anderson".

Oct 28, 2026

DavidHOST
72:58
I really need to look this up because this is good.
DavidHOST
73:02
Perry Anderson.
DavidHOST
73:03
The ideology of Swiss progression design.
DavidHOST
73:06
Jesus.
DavidHOST
73:07
This is good stuff.
DavidHOST
73:09
Did I get that? Perry Anderson.
DavidHOST
73:11
Nice.
DavidHOST
73:11
Nice.
David A. HughesGUEST
38:32
I also mentioned in my talk, famous historians like Charles and Mary Beard, very influential in the first half of the 20th century, and then just edged out again.
David A. HughesGUEST
38:42
Or you can think about I mean, there was a time back in the 1970s, 1980s, Where there were some quite famous historians, Perry Anderson, Eric Hobsbawm, E.P. Thompson, Stuart Hall, Louis Althusser, David Harvey, a bit later, Emanuel Wallerstein, people like this.
David A. HughesGUEST
38:57
You wouldn't necessarily call them Marxists, but they weren't afraid to talk about class in their work and they were widely read and cited.
David A. HughesGUEST
39:05
But again, all of that has kind of fallen away now.
Coll McCailGUEST
15:19
There's a variety of different reasons that people have used to explain why Britain doesn't follow the trajectory of the European continent in terms of mobilisation.
Coll McCailGUEST
15:32
Perry Anderson and Tom Nairn used to say that it was about the fact that Britain had its revolution first in the sense that the English Civil War came before the French and American revolutions and that meant that our constitution was embedded far earlier and therefore is more enduring and lasting and that is why we have what would be perceived as a more orderly society to that of Europe but I think that's British exceptionalism and So in this case, I think like we should remember that we have had summers of discontent, right? It's just not on our terms or the terms that I would like to see protests take place, right? Just this summer, we saw scores of demonstrators out in outlying schemes across the city, right? But they were protesting immigration rather than the cost of living, certainly explicitly.
Coll McCailGUEST
16:24
So it's not like we haven't seen spontaneous demonstrations of discontent in Britain, very violent ones, particularly in the case of anti-immigration riots attempting to burn down hotels with migrants inside them, for example, in recent years.
Coll McCailGUEST
16:40
So these issues are our issues too.
Thomas JonesHOST
0:36
Reviewing the antinomies of realism in the LRB in 2014, Michael Wood observed that Jameson thinks dialectically in the strong sense, in the way we are all supposed to think, but almost no one does.
Thomas JonesHOST
0:48
As Perry Anderson has written, Jameson's account of postmodernism develops for the first time a theory of the cultural logic of capital that simultaneously offers a portrait of the transformations of this social form as a whole.
Thomas JonesHOST
1:00
Here, in the passage from the sectoral to the general, the vocation of Western Marxism has reached its most complete consummation." Praising the spacious rhythms of his complex yet supple syntax and sudden bursts of metaphoric intensity, Anderson called Jameson a great writer.
Thomas JonesHOST
1:18
He was also, as Toral Moy has written recently in the LRB, a great reader.
Natasha LennardGUEST
28:19
Even in the book itself, I note is not a particular popular choice for most leftist thought.
Natasha LennardGUEST
28:25
Particularly Marxists, including Perry Anderson, have really, like, decried Wittgensteinian philosophy as counter-revolutionary, leaving the world as it is found, um, offering us nothing, uh, as leftist thinkers and, and activists and organizers.
Natasha LennardGUEST
28:41
And I'm not saying that I know better than Perry Anderson [laughs], uh, at all, but I've always found Wittgenstein's work insofar as it draws our attention to the concepts that we use, how they circulate, how our language games hold certain frameworks stable or open to shift intellectually useful and, and very malleable.
Natasha LennardGUEST
29:05
So Wittgenstein himself, you're not gonna get any sort of inspirational political program at all, and it's not strange that he's also being claimed by conservatives.
Natasha LennardGUEST
29:14
But I follow in a legacy of people like Stanley Cavell, and more recently people like Rupert Read and my colleague at The New School, Alice Crary, who I think are very convincing in pointing to liberatory reads of Wittgenstein's Philosophy of Language and making us pay attention to what we do when we do things with words and the kind of, um, mystifying and, uh, obscuring effects that can have.
Natasha LeonardGUEST
28:14
Wittgenstein is very much my jumping off point for this book.
Natasha LeonardGUEST
28:18
Even in the book itself, I note, is not a particular popular choice for most leftist thought, particularly Marxists, including Perry Anderson, have really like decried Wittgensteinian philosophy as counter-revolutionary, leaving the world as it is found, offering us nothing as leftist thinkers and activists and organisers.
Natasha LeonardGUEST
28:40
And I'm not saying that I know better than Perry Anderson at all, but I've always found Wittgenstein's work insofar as it draws our attention to the concepts that we use, how they circulate, how our language games hold certain frameworks stable or open to shift.
Natasha LeonardGUEST
29:00
intellectually useful and very malleable.
Natasha LeonardGUEST
29:03
So Wittgenstein himself, you're not going to get any sort of inspirational political program at all.
Andrea RuggeriGUEST
24:28
It...
Andrea RuggeriGUEST
24:29
We can put it also in a different way in the sense that, and this is what Perry Anderson used to say, that actually nationalism and internationalism have a dialectic, uh, movements, a pendular movements.
Andrea RuggeriGUEST
24:42
So you cannot think about Yalta without a wave of nationalism.
Andrea RuggeriGUEST
24:46
You know, the raise of fascism and Nazism, uh, and after that experience, the- the- the enormous, uh- uh, architecture, there was the United Nation, but was also Bretton Woods.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.