Office of Congressional Conduct

Her office said, "Oh, the original numbers failed to account for the business' debts." The new range for the couple's assets, huh, goes from 6 million and 30 million to 18,000 to 95,000.

So in September, the House's Office of Congressional Conduct voted five to one to recommend that the Ethics Committee dismiss the complaint.

Her office calls, Ilhan office, her- Ilhan Omar's office calls that vindication.

Pirro says the House doesn't matter to her.

When it comes to the financial fraud, there is a huge trail there.

What is astonishing to me is that a nonpartisan entity that was supposed to review this, the Office of Congressional Conduct, they actually recently cleared her of misconduct.

How on earth did that happen? To tell you the truth, I want even that committee to be looked into, because she had initially claimed that she and her husband were worth between six to 30 million, and then no, no, no, they revised that down.

Now they're worth less than 100,000.

Right.

And then in 2021, the Office of Congressional Ethics, it's a nonpartisan group now, it's called the Office of Congressional Conduct.

They investigated Omar's financial disclosures, outside income, and the board of that group unanimously recommended dismissing the charges.

Then, though, there was a second OCC review of her finances a few years ago, I think, based on different financial disclosures.

Judicial Watch's interest in allegations concerning Omar predates this present search.

As I reported to you earlier, on July 23rd, 2019, six years ago, over six years ago, six and a half years ago almost, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics requesting an investigation of allegations of perjury, immigration fraud, marriage fraud, state and federal tax fraud, and federal student loan fraud.

Obtaining and analyzing the warrant materials would further Judicial Watch's longstanding efforts to inform the public about these issues and the government's response.

In addition, Judicial Watch argues that the public has a right to access these judicial records under the common law and the First Amendment.

In at least one of those cases, uh, Mynett and Haler settled f- by paying $1.2 million to two South Dakota cannabis companies and their investors.

In September, the Office of Congressional Conduct voted to recommend the House Ethics Committee drop a probe into misconduct allegations related to Omar's financial disclosures.

I guess the, the vinegar trick worked in, uh, in Congress as well.

Right? Right? I mean, oh, you know, we don't, we don't want, uh, w- we, we can't, we can't show how corrupt this person is because then people might get really mad at her.

And why would that why would Mike Collins do that? Well, apparently it was to cover up this scandal within his office.

This scandal came to the attention of the Office of Congressional Conduct, which is a nonpartisan office within the House that takes a first look at allegations of this kind and others involving bad behavior by congressional members and staff.

They did an investigation, which they found that this no-show job had been given to Carolyn Craze.

And as they looked at this, the people who were investigating for the OCC got no cooperation whatsoever from Representative Collins.

But if there's a crime that was committed, it'll be prosecuted.

And then, uh, Roberts asked her about the allegations of financial misconduct, um, with all the discrepancies on her political disclosures, and he pointed out that the Office of Congressional Conduct voted five to one to recommend dismissal of the allegations to the Ethics Committee of the US House.

She said, "That doesn't matter.

I can tell you that is subject to an investigation as well, but it doesn't matter.