Nuclear strategy

And we'll look at these stories and offer our candid perspectives on what they mean for deterrence, national security, great power competition, and a preservation of peace through strength.

And so whether the headlines involve emerging technologies, military modernization, nuclear strategy, geopolitical competition, Or Curtis's favorite cartoon, I don't care.

It's what we got to pick, right? And so let's explore how these developments inform the theory and practice of deterrence.

So let's get started, Curtis.

And so I thought this was worthy of thinking about here in the news.

It's not an article you're going to necessarily see.

It was published in an article in the Odessa Journal on 19 October called Russia's Nuclear Strategy Increasingly Focused on Preemptive Strikes and Countering Western Defenses.

Rather than review the article, I went to the report and did a little bit of review of the report itself.

And definitely check out his books.

The two that I've read was The Nuclear Strategy and the...

What is the other one? What's the name? The Ukraine one, the title? Oh, Ukraine and the Art of Strategy.

Ukraine and the Art, yeah, which is about 2014 and thereafter.

We're going to get straight into it.

Today's topic is the evolution of U.S. nuclear strategy.

from a bipolar European theatre to dealing with a tripolar system with China and in the Asia Pacific.

And who better than one of my favourite people in the world, Frank Miller, to join us today.