New York State Rifle and Pistol Association

And while maybe someday this will get repealed, 'cause of course-

course-You know, going by especially the, the, the NYSRPA test, the, the guns that fought the American Revolution were 100% homemade.

Mm-hmm.

I don't think there was-

Both Connecticut and Illinois have, at least one Illinois county, have a ban on what they call assault weapons, which violates the Second Amendment, also violates the 14th Amendment, at least that's the claim in the cases, Vermontese versus Cook County and Grant v. Higgins.

And it's, again, a chance for the court to come back and say, listen, when we said in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. Bruin that these are not super scary, you know, dangerous weapons, they're in common use, you cannot, you know, they are protected by the Second Amendment, did the court actually mean that? And again, it's important because the court has already made this decision.

They said specifically in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association, in the Bruin case, that if you're going to ban guns, you're going to restrict firearms, it must be consistent with our country's history and tradition.

And well, let's face it, the country's history and tradition was not to ban a class of firearm because some group found it scary.

The justices on December second will consider whether Connecticut's and an Illinois county's bans on so-called assault weapons violate the Second and Fourteenth Amendments.

Oral arguments in the cases, known as Vermontes versus Cook County and Grant versus Higgins, is expected to address whether the laws comply with the Supreme Court's decision in New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin.

In that case, the court said gun restrictions must be consistent with how the country historically regulated firearms.

Next, Catholics are suing Colorado over preschool funding.

They loathed it.

Which brings us to the tectonic shift of 2022, New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin.

In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court threw the two-step balancing test out the window.

They declared that courts cannot weigh public safety against a constitutional right.

But yeah, it's these these things have to change.

So but definitely like look at New York State Rifle Pistol Association and again, just

get educated who you're voting for.

So if you're in a state that does not have a lot of Second Amendment, you know, politics happening in a negative way, send your money to states that are having all of these problems like New York and California.

statutes, blah, blah, blah, blah, are inconsistent with the Second Amendment as interpreted by the Supreme Court in District of Columbia versus Heller.

New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruin, and subsequent decisions including Wolford v. Lopez.

These statutes generally prohibit federally licensed dealers from selling handguns or handgun ammunition to individuals under 21.

Now, that handgun ammunition is always a weird one.

That's the gun rights decision.

New York State Rifle and Pistol Association versus Bruen, that's the case that applied that decision to the states, and subsequent decisions including Wolford versus Lopez.

These statutes generally prohibit federally licensed dealers from telling hand- from selling handguns or handgun ammunition to individuals under 21.

The Office of Legal Counsel determined that 18 to 20-year-olds are among the people protected by the Second Amendment.