Skip to main content
National Institute of Standards and Technology

National Institute of Standards and Technology

Search complete. 1139 mentions across 425 episodes found for "National Institute of Standards and Technology".

Sep 23, 2026

Jim BergmannGUEST
16:56
Everybody's using really good capacitive humidity sensors.
Jim BergmannGUEST
16:59
So, like, the quality of measurements that we have today is approaching the metrological grade equipment they use at NIST.
Jim BergmannGUEST
17:07
I mean, I've been to NIST and tested probes.
Jim BergmannGUEST
17:10
our calculations on MeasureQuick compared to NIST, using, literally pulling instruments out of my car and walking into the lab, and we're in the uncertainty range, meaning that their metrological grade instrumentation that's extremely accurate, highly calibrated, the stuff I pulled out of my car was in the uncertainty range.
Jim BergmannGUEST
17:30
In other words, their stuff and our stuff was reading so close together, they couldn't tell me whether our stuff or their stuff was right.
Jim BergmannGUEST
17:36
because they're overlapping that close.
Herman PoppleberryHOST
10:38
And this is where the industry's own standards body has been clear for years.
Herman PoppleberryHOST
10:42
NIST deprecated SMS as a restricted authenticator a while back.
Herman PoppleberryHOST
10:46
They didn't ban it, but they flagged it because SMS is interceptable and because, and this is the part people miss, it's losable.
Herman PoppleberryHOST
10:53
Fastmail has a documented position on this that I find clarifying.

5 MINS LATER

Herman PoppleberryHOST
16:04
It's all just decisions about who counts as a user.
CornHOST
16:07
Herman, let me put the uncomfortable version to you.
CornHOST
16:11
If all of this is documented, if the falsehood's lists exist, if NIST said it years ago, if Fastmail wrote down the trade-off in plain language, why
Herman PoppleberryHOST
16:20
is the default still the lockout? Because the lockout is cheap, and the recovery path is expensive, and the cost of the lockout is paid by someone who isn't in the room.
Tim CallanHOST
0:11
And there was a fascinating presentation about South Korea.
Tim CallanHOST
0:21
And it's completely independent post-quantum cryptography program, which is aimed at coming up with a completely independent set of PQC algorithms that are not MLChem or MLDSA or any of the other ones that we're getting out of NIST.
Tim CallanHOST
0:43
So...
Tim CallanHOST
0:44
What's going on
Jason SorokoHOST
1:08
Justin Moody has been on.
Jason SorokoHOST
1:09
Yes.
Jason SorokoHOST
1:10
We talked about NIST's selections for post-quantum algorithms.
Jason SorokoHOST
1:13
What's gone to standardization? What's on the on-ramp? Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
Al MartinHOST
13:18
they're like, what? But again, way out in front.
Al MartinHOST
13:21
In fact, if I have this right, I think there were four algorithms that NIST took and three of them, we invented, we as an IBM.
Al MartinHOST
13:31
And the other one was invented by somebody else that I think I haven't proven this or I haven't validated this.
Al MartinHOST
13:36
So just to be clear that we brought that person on.
Al MartinHOST
13:41
So now we have all four.
Tina TarquinioGUEST
13:42
Of the algorithms that NIST is standardized on.
Tina TarquinioGUEST
13:44
So NIST is the governing body for this space in the U.S. Three of the four algorithms had direct IBM involvement through our teams, obviously working with research, you know, in our labs around the world.
Tina TarquinioGUEST
13:55
And the fourth We had a tie to the person, as you say, that did the development.
David LaceyGUEST
15:04
So we avoided technical detail because standards that mention specific technologies not only date quickly, but they also prevent a level playing field.
David LaceyGUEST
15:16
The US standards body, NIST, saw the first version of our work and actually wanted to publish it as a NIST document.
David LaceyGUEST
15:24
But BSI objected on copyright grounds.
David LaceyGUEST
15:28
They did, however, give us a very nice plug in the introduction to the generally accepted system security principles.
Sabine HazanGUEST
17:03
I didn't trust my, my NIH.
Sabine HazanGUEST
17:05
I didn't trust the scientists at NIST.
Sabine HazanGUEST
17:07
I didn't trust the scientists at CDC.
Sabine HazanGUEST
17:10
The CDC, I called them on my data to show them that there was a lot of bifidobacteria, and they're like, "We don't understand the microbiome just yet."
Roger GrimesGUEST
1:26
And they've kind of named that post-quantum cryptography.
Roger GrimesGUEST
1:30
And NIST held a public contest a bunch of years ago that finally selected these finalists.
Roger GrimesGUEST
1:35
And we do have these finalists that you're supposed to replace RSA Diffie-Hellman elliptic curve cryptography with the new NIST finalist.
Roger GrimesGUEST
1:44
And they call that post-quantum cryptography.
Roger GrimesGUEST
1:46
And the idea is that you're supposed to upgrade your quantum susceptible cryptography to the quantum resistant cryptography.
David PollakGUEST
19:31
We are out of time.
David PollakGUEST
19:33
And, you know, NIST estimates it's going to take 10 years for the software infrastructure to be upgraded.
David PollakGUEST
19:41
We got four.
Tuboise FloydHOST
19:43
Yeah.

11 MINS LATER

Tuboise FloydHOST
30:56
Yeah.
Tuboise FloydHOST
30:57
Yeah.
Tuboise FloydHOST
30:59
You know, that's a great, thank you, a great lead-in to what I'm going to ask, right? Spice Labs is mapping posture against things like CNS 2.0, NIST IR 8547, and other requirements.
Tuboise FloydHOST
31:13
But we both know what can happen with compliance.
Walter HaddockHOST
25:47
AI transparency and explainability are different things, but you would not know it from reading most of the documents out there.
Walter HaddockHOST
25:56
ISO, NIST, EU AI Act.
Walter HaddockHOST
26:01
They all talk about... transparency and explainability, but don't do a really good job of distinguishing between the two.
Walter HaddockHOST
26:08
I wrote an entire article on transparency, explainability and interpretability and provided some concrete definitions.
Jason BermasGUEST
14:41
They totally ignore.
Jason BermasGUEST
14:43
And that's NIST debunkers like this one that we have on record.
Jason BermasGUEST
14:49
temperatures of over 2,000 degrees.
Jason BermasGUEST
14:53
Pataki went on the record and said it.

415 more episodes mention National Institute of Standards and Technology.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.