National Institute of Standards and Technology
1.1k
MENTIONS
425
EPISODES
321
PODCASTS
Search complete. 1139 mentions across 425 episodes found for "National Institute of Standards and Technology".
Sep 23, 2026
Why commissioning is essential for profitable HVAC businesses with Jim Bergmann
J
16:56Jim BergmannGUEST
Everybody's using really good capacitive humidity sensors.
J
16:59Jim BergmannGUEST
So, like, the quality of measurements that we have today is approaching the metrological grade equipment they use at NIST.
J
17:07Jim BergmannGUEST
I mean, I've been to NIST and tested probes.
J
17:10Jim BergmannGUEST
our calculations on MeasureQuick compared to NIST, using, literally pulling instruments out of my car and walking into the lab, and we're in the uncertainty range, meaning that their metrological grade instrumentation that's extremely accurate, highly calibrated, the stuff I pulled out of my car was in the uncertainty range.
J
17:30Jim BergmannGUEST
In other words, their stuff and our stuff was reading so close together, they couldn't tell me whether our stuff or their stuff was right.
J
17:36Jim BergmannGUEST
because they're overlapping that close.
When Login Systems Lock Out Their Own Users
H
10:38Herman PoppleberryHOST
And this is where the industry's own standards body has been clear for years.
H
10:42Herman PoppleberryHOST
NIST deprecated SMS as a restricted authenticator a while back.
H
10:46Herman PoppleberryHOST
They didn't ban it, but they flagged it because SMS is interceptable and because, and this is the part people miss, it's losable.
H
10:53Herman PoppleberryHOST
Fastmail has a documented position on this that I find clarifying.
5 MINS LATER
H
16:04Herman PoppleberryHOST
It's all just decisions about who counts as a user.
C
16:07CornHOST
Herman, let me put the uncomfortable version to you.
C
16:11CornHOST
If all of this is documented, if the falsehood's lists exist, if NIST said it years ago, if Fastmail wrote down the trade-off in plain language, why
H
16:20Herman PoppleberryHOST
is the default still the lockout? Because the lockout is cheap, and the recovery path is expensive, and the cost of the lockout is paid by someone who isn't in the room.
Root Causes 667: South Korea Has a Parallel PQC Program with Separate Algorithms
T
0:11Tim CallanHOST
And there was a fascinating presentation about South Korea.
T
0:21Tim CallanHOST
And it's completely independent post-quantum cryptography program, which is aimed at coming up with a completely independent set of PQC algorithms that are not MLChem or MLDSA or any of the other ones that we're getting out of NIST.
T
0:43Tim CallanHOST
So...
T
0:44Tim CallanHOST
What's going on
J
1:08Jason SorokoHOST
Justin Moody has been on.
J
1:09Jason SorokoHOST
Yes.
J
1:10Jason SorokoHOST
We talked about NIST's selections for post-quantum algorithms.
J
1:13Jason SorokoHOST
What's gone to standardization? What's on the on-ramp? Blah, blah, blah, blah, blah.
In case you missed it....How Do You Build AI That Actually Works 99.999999% of the Time? With Tina Tarquinio Chief Product Officer of IBM Z and LinuxONE
A
13:18Al MartinHOST
they're like, what? But again, way out in front.
A
13:21Al MartinHOST
In fact, if I have this right, I think there were four algorithms that NIST took and three of them, we invented, we as an IBM.
A
13:31Al MartinHOST
And the other one was invented by somebody else that I think I haven't proven this or I haven't validated this.
A
13:36Al MartinHOST
So just to be clear that we brought that person on.
A
13:41Al MartinHOST
So now we have all four.
T
13:42Tina TarquinioGUEST
Of the algorithms that NIST is standardized on.
T
13:44Tina TarquinioGUEST
So NIST is the governing body for this space in the U.S. Three of the four algorithms had direct IBM involvement through our teams, obviously working with research, you know, in our labs around the world.
T
13:55Tina TarquinioGUEST
And the fourth We had a tie to the person, as you say, that did the development.
Cyber Security: Why AI means we need human-first standards
D
15:04David LaceyGUEST
So we avoided technical detail because standards that mention specific technologies not only date quickly, but they also prevent a level playing field.
D
15:16David LaceyGUEST
The US standards body, NIST, saw the first version of our work and actually wanted to publish it as a NIST document.
D
15:24David LaceyGUEST
But BSI objected on copyright grounds.
D
15:28David LaceyGUEST
They did, however, give us a very nice plug in the introduction to the generally accepted system security principles.
Dr. Sabine Hazan on the Microbiome Research Nobody's Funding
S
17:03Sabine HazanGUEST
I didn't trust my, my NIH.
S
17:05Sabine HazanGUEST
I didn't trust the scientists at NIST.
S
17:07Sabine HazanGUEST
I didn't trust the scientists at CDC.
S
17:10Sabine HazanGUEST
The CDC, I called them on my data to show them that there was a lot of bifidobacteria, and they're like, "We don't understand the microbiome just yet."
US Govt Gets PQC Threats Backward. Should You Ignore Their Recommendations? Roger Grimes, Field CISO
R
1:26Roger GrimesGUEST
And they've kind of named that post-quantum cryptography.
R
1:30Roger GrimesGUEST
And NIST held a public contest a bunch of years ago that finally selected these finalists.
R
1:35Roger GrimesGUEST
And we do have these finalists that you're supposed to replace RSA Diffie-Hellman elliptic curve cryptography with the new NIST finalist.
R
1:44Roger GrimesGUEST
And they call that post-quantum cryptography.
R
1:46Roger GrimesGUEST
And the idea is that you're supposed to upgrade your quantum susceptible cryptography to the quantum resistant cryptography.
Post-Quantum Readiness: Can You Find Your Cryptography Before Quantum Does? | David Pollak
D
19:31David PollakGUEST
We are out of time.
D
19:33David PollakGUEST
And, you know, NIST estimates it's going to take 10 years for the software infrastructure to be upgraded.
D
19:41David PollakGUEST
We got four.
T
19:43Tuboise FloydHOST
Yeah.
11 MINS LATER
T
30:56Tuboise FloydHOST
Yeah.
T
30:57Tuboise FloydHOST
Yeah.
T
30:59Tuboise FloydHOST
You know, that's a great, thank you, a great lead-in to what I'm going to ask, right? Spice Labs is mapping posture against things like CNS 2.0, NIST IR 8547, and other requirements.
T
31:13Tuboise FloydHOST
But we both know what can happen with compliance.
AI Agents, Permissions, and Accountability
W
25:47Walter HaddockHOST
AI transparency and explainability are different things, but you would not know it from reading most of the documents out there.
W
25:56Walter HaddockHOST
ISO, NIST, EU AI Act.
W
26:01Walter HaddockHOST
They all talk about... transparency and explainability, but don't do a really good job of distinguishing between the two.
W
26:08Walter HaddockHOST
I wrote an entire article on transparency, explainability and interpretability and provided some concrete definitions.
The 9/11 Legacy And Society In A Post Truth World With Mike Ryan
J
14:41Jason BermasGUEST
They totally ignore.
J
14:43Jason BermasGUEST
And that's NIST debunkers like this one that we have on record.
J
14:49Jason BermasGUEST
temperatures of over 2,000 degrees.
J
14:53Jason BermasGUEST
Pataki went on the record and said it.
415 more episodes mention National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.