So could you dig into that a little bit?

Yeah, there's a longstanding debate in political science about the nature of partisanship.

And you could always say, well, some people do say, well, party is just a summary of people's political attitudes.

But we know from a range of evidence that that tends not to be the case.

So the first piece of evidence, we can go all the way back in people's political development to their childhood, and we can look at what develops first.

in this chicken and egg question.

And we find that people gain a sense of partisan understanding initially, especially from their parents.

Would you agree with that or would you want to revise or even throw out that hypothesis?