Yeah

... a little bit of everything.

And then, like, our wetland camo, which is, you know, real popular for us in Texas, 'cause we hunt a, a lot of our coastal prairies and stuff like that, and it's really, really good down there.

We don't have a lot of flooded timber like you guys hunt and stuff up here.

You know, we're hunting big salt marshes with big, tall grass and, you know, small, like, scrub brush along the edges and stuff.

And then our other pattern, Midland, is really was designed around hunting our West Texas, like, arid, like, high desert mountain areas and our South Texas, like, scrub brush.

Because it's such a dense, like, break-up pattern, it really...

I guess you don't have to feed it

it's also a bit of a shitty job to uh recollect them and clean them and then decide to swallow it again

yeah yeah there's also dangerous you know yeah like you don't want to if you if you crash it can be dangerous you can't get an mri while you have one in and all this and that so it's like the best way of doing it is pretty much a bad way of doing it in our world um that's great for like establishing a protocol at one time and then applying it out, but it's not sort of a great ongoing tool for us.

So then basically we use tools that to some degree extrapolate or correlate to core temperature, which is, Core temperature would be what you really want to know, but there's not a great way of directly measuring it.

So the core device is a tool for us.

Just very easy.

Sits on the outside of your skin.

uses your heart rate monitor as part of the data input to their algorithm and extrapolates core temp from that.

And to me, it was sort of, you know, I saw this as a bit of a common sense issue, which is to say, Are we getting the minimum effective dose to create these changes, or are we overdoing it and potentially risking other negative cascade effects here? So how do you see it, and how do you try to account for it?