Murthy v. Missouri
Case in courtWikipedia
7
MENTIONS
7
EPISODES
7
PODCASTS
Search complete. 7 mentions across 7 episodes found for "Murthy v. Missouri".
Oct 15, 2026
Hochul and Blakeman Clash in Fiery Debate! Vance Slams Democrats on Crime — Plus, Mike Davis Returns! - Oct 14 Hr 3
J
33:27Joe PagsHOST
Look, maybe morally you and I could talk about that over a drink, but, but when it comes to doing the job, has there been a finer AG than Ken Paxton? I mean, maybe Bailey when he was in Missouri, but Paxton has been...
J
33:38Joe PagsHOST
I mean, when you talk about Missouri v. Biden, Paxton was all over that.
J
33:40Joe PagsHOST
When you talk about suing Google and Meta, Facebook, suing all these social, social media sites, when you talk about keeping men and boys out of girls' and womens' sports, Ken Paxton has been the guy.
J
33:50Joe PagsHOST
Is he not touting his praises as much as I am? 'Cause how can this be tied?
David Mauricio DEMOLISHES MAGA In 20V1 DEBATE
D
85:15David MauricioSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
...
D
85:15David MauricioSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
they ruled in Murthy v. Missouri, uh, in 2024 that there was no evidence in favor of this idea that the Biden administration violated the first amendment rights of any of these people.
D
85:22David MauricioSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
So that's already settled.
G
85:23GavinSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
So what? So they found a way around the rule.
1 Liberal vs 20 MAGA (ft. The Split’s David Mauricio) | Surrounded
S
48:17speaker_13PANELIST
The Supreme Court? Yes.
D
48:19David MauricioGUEST
They ruled in Murphy v. Missouri in 2024 that there was no evidence in favor of this idea that the Biden administration violated the First Amendment rights of any of these people.
D
48:28David MauricioGUEST
So that's already settled.
D
48:29David MauricioGUEST
So they found a way around the rule.
Lawfare Archive: National Security and the 2024 Election, Election Management
Q
53:42Quinta JurecicPANELIST
Um, and we also saw a sort of parallel effort, um, in the courts, uh, by Republican attorneys general around the country to push back against coordination between the US government and these platforms.
Q
53:56Quinta JurecicPANELIST
So this is the, uh, Murthy v. Missouri Supreme Court case on, uh, jawboning is the term that's often used.
Q
54:02Quinta JurecicPANELIST
The argument essentially is, you know, um, if the FBI taps Facebook on the shoulder and says, "Hey, you should take this, this down," that could potentially raise First Amendment concerns.
Q
54:12Quinta JurecicPANELIST
I don't, I don't think that's an insane argument.
The $110 Billion Paramount Merger & Michael's Political Pundit Tier List
M
10:56Michael CampanellaHOST
Okay.
J
10:56Jake HuffakerHOST
When you look at the case of Murthy v. Missouri, where they ruled that the Biden administration was pressuring social media companies, namely Facebook, to take down right-wing content in the sort of early Biden administration.
J
11:11Jake HuffakerHOST
And for the record, that case got really complicated, and they ended up overturning it and based not on the merits of the case, but based on jurisdiction and, uh, whether or not you, like, had the right to even sue at all in the Supreme Court.
J
11:24Jake HuffakerHOST
But in the appellate court, they ruled, and the, one of the things that was happening was this sort of underpinning of a subtle threat of like, you know, "It would be a shame if we were to do some crazy stuff to Facebook, so you probably should take down all this, you know, right-wing content," and an intense pressure gambit.
THEY CAME FOR THE BOMBERS | In the Litter Box w/ Jewels & Catturd – Ep. 1103 – 9/28/2026
J
48:49Jewels JonesHOST
They were involved in it and several others.
J
48:51Jewels JonesHOST
It was the Biden administration, Missouri v. Biden.
J
48:55Jewels JonesHOST
And that was the freedom of speech and all of that.
J
48:59Jewels JonesHOST
They went after that.
1 more episode mentions Murthy v. Missouri.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.