Miguel Stanley

I mean, on a CBCT, I mean, obviously I take them every day of the week and there's so much information in those scans.

And that's the beauty of it, right? I was speaking with Miguel Stanley recently, and he's very passionate about the usage of CBCT in terms of visualizing things that we would never see on two-dimensional films.

And I do agree with that wholeheartedly because you can take a DPT and see very little And then you take a CT and especially the thing that always comes to mind is the upper root treated molars that look fine on a 2D image.

You don't see any symptoms, but then you look under the three-dimensional lens and you see large areas, huge inflammation and hyperplasia of the sinus lining and fractured roots, fractured teeth, all sorts that you would just never see on a two-dimensional image.

So would you roll the CBCD everyone? I think there's a case to be made for it.

I know Miguel Stanley.

Because the

dose is quite small, isn't it? Smaller than an OPG, I