Memorandum of understanding

The Iranians, as well, refused to agree to a ceasefire until the blockade was lifted, as you remember.

This is what led to the MOU.

They were not going to agree to a ceasefire just because Trump wanted one.

They were not in a position in which they would say, oh, we're hurting so badly that we'll agree to any ceasefire under any conditions.

That Trump's perspective is for him.

The key get is a nuclear concession.

If the key get is at the end of the process, which is what it would have been in the MOU, and the Iranian key get is in the beginning of the process, the lifting of the blockade, then it is an uneven agreement.

From the Iranian perspective, it is not an uneven agreement because the Iranians are saying, yes, you will lift the blockade, but we will open the strait.

When projects involve both agencies, what does that process look like today?

Well, what we're attempting to do, and the MOU was signed on September 29th, and it was kind of a neat ceremony.

We had Secretary Scott Turner come in from HUD, And to him, Secretary Rawlins signed this MOU that is meant to eliminate redundancy and streamline a lot of the regulatory process with housing.

Of course, in our case, we're talking about rural housing and the concerns for affordability.

And when you layer all these regs, we were finding in our case that not only did you have local regs, you had state regs.

And the intent for Secretary Turner with HUD as well as Secretary Rawlins with USDA is to streamline that process, eliminate the redundancy, streamline it, make it easier for the borrower.

and hopefully quicker turnaround time for the loans and overall with the objective overall of making the process more affordable.

In the world today before that, MOU, where did the most duplication come from? Was it in the regulatory review? Was it in permitting? What are you trying to streamline exactly?

We'll typically look at your financial records and be like, I think you can afford to pay a little bit over here.

But most times we do give them out for free and we just do what's called an MOU, a memorandum of understanding.

And we say our donors have provided these Bibles.

So in turn, can you give us some pictures and some feedback and how the Bibles were used, some testimonies, how they impacted their lives? And then we'll share that with our donors and sometimes put it in our newsletters.

Let's talk about the Arctic.

DP World, the Dubai giant, just signed an MOU with the Arctic Gateway Group and Centerport Canada.

They're eyeing the port of Churchill in Manitoba as a trimodal corridor.

Wait, Churchill? Like the actual Arctic? Exactly.

A Scania group truck will carry 56 kilograms of hydrogen and combine a 300-kilowatt fuel cell with a rechargeable battery, giving it a range of several hundred kilometers to carry out commercial logistics.

In Egypt, Noah Ajare reports that a global green fuels hub development is underway with Green Hydrogen Development Holding Limited, a subsidiary of Hong Kong-listed United Energy Group, UEG, signing a Memorandum of Understanding, MOU, with Aboukir Fertilisers and Chemicals Company, Alexandria Fertilisers, and Oriscom Construction.

The partnership aims to develop a green hydrogen hub in Alexandria, integrating renewables-powered green hydrogen production into existing ammonia infrastructure.

Under the MOU, UEG and Oriscom will lead feasibility studies for 500 MW of renewable energy generation, combining wind and solar, with green hydrogen production capacity equivalent to 480 tonnes of green ammonia a day.

It will not be funded by Jamaican taxpayers and it is capped at 25 people per fortnight.

Question for one of the things for discussion that many people keep asking is, where the MOU there? Of course, that is Patois for those who don't know.

Where the MOU there? Why has the full MOU not been made available for public scrutiny? What's your talk? What's your take on this? And persons, your views as well.

This is, I don't understand why I would engage a lawyer to negotiate on my behalf.

And once the deal is struck, he says to me, he or she says to me, here are the highlights of the agreement, but I can't show you the agreement.

Utter nonsense because the IMO is not going to pay for these persons on an indefinite period.

And if these people don't leave the country, we're under an obligation to accommodate them.

Well, as what one of our contributors said, they are truly hiding things for the MOU, which is why they do not want to disclose it to the public.

But before you answer, excuse me, Tom, you have to train for that event, though.

You just can't write the MOU, you just can't build the collaboration, you just can't go to government officials and have that happen.

Somebody's got to train the local folks on wildland firefighting.

Somebody's got to train the wildland folks on the medical things and the structural components and those sort of things.

The current transportation as a service is estimated to be priced at about $2 per mile, while carriers that own the trucks will pay Aurora about 85 cents per mile to use the Aurora driver system and backend services.

Earlier this year, Hirschbach signed an MOU for 500 Aurora-powered trucks, and this week, Charger Logistics signed a similar agreement for another 500.

Both companies are already using the transportation as a service to haul loads, and the new trucks are expected to be delivered in 2027 and 2028.

Aurora is targeting having about 30,000 trucks powered by its automated driving system on U.S. roads by 2030.