Mean time between failures
14
MENTIONS
9
EPISODES
7
PODCASTS
Search complete. 14 mentions across 9 episodes found for "Mean time between failures".
Oct 2, 2026
SOR 1213 Are You Really Measuring Reliability?
F
4:04Fred SchenkelbergHOST
He showed me all these data sheets.
F
4:05Fred SchenkelbergHOST
They all had 50,000 hour MTBF in bold with a box around it and stuff, and, and, like, all these things, from itty bitty fans that fit on a single component up to great big blowers that fit on a great big box.
F
4:19Fred SchenkelbergHOST
They all were exactly 50K.
F
4:22Fred SchenkelbergHOST
And I'm like, "Well, that's amazing that you engineered them all to be the same." He goes, "What do you mean? That's just the thing on a spread- on a data sheet.
F
7:22Fred SchenkelbergHOST
But some of that is pre...
F
7:26Fred SchenkelbergHOST
Part of it is...
F
7:27Fred SchenkelbergHOST
And I got this the other day from a, a comment, was, why is MTBF and MTTF and all this stuff and fit rates so prevalent? And, uh, my immediate response was, because it's so easy to get what appears to be a good answer, and then you don't have to worry about it.
F
7:44Fred SchenkelbergHOST
Except reality doesn't care what makes you feel good.
Intermission E05: TCS
R
39:39Rohan DharmakumarHOST
Let's get lots of information in one shot and then give the results.
R
39:45Rohan DharmakumarHOST
Because they are optimized for high throughput, you know, the way to kind of look at mainframe success is through this very interesting term called MTBF, which is mean time between failure.
R
39:58Rohan DharmakumarHOST
It is a term that captures how long has a computer been operating before there is a failure.
R
40:05Rohan DharmakumarHOST
And can you guess that for mainframes, that time MTBF is often measured in decades.
R
40:12Rohan DharmakumarHOST
As in, if you commission a mainframe today, it may not go down for the next 10 years, 20 years or 30 years because it is engineered for reliability and throughput.
R
40:22Rohan DharmakumarHOST
Back then in the 1960s and 70s, IBM was largely importing, refurbishing second-hand computers from developed markets.
Risk Management: BCP, DRP, RTO/RPO & Risk Math
S
5:19Sec GuyHOST
For the senior viewers, you must also monitor your reliability metrics.
S
5:25Sec GuyHOST
MTBF or meantime between failures tells you how reliable your hardware is.
S
5:32Sec GuyHOST
The higher the number, the better.
S
5:36Sec GuyHOST
MTTR, or mean time to repair, tells you how fast your team is.
AI Agents, Identity, and the Security Gap
E
20:50Ev KontsevoyGUEST
So, for example, you have like machines that behave in a very, very predictable way.
E
20:57Ev KontsevoyGUEST
And when manufacturer makes a machine like a computer, they put like MTBF rating, mean time between failure.
E
21:03Ev KontsevoyGUEST
So you look at that number and then you look at that how many machines you have.
E
21:07Ev KontsevoyGUEST
And it gives you like actually pretty decent numbers.
Bringing Physical AI to a Billion Machines (Applied Intuition Co-founder Peter Ludwig)
H
17:34Harry CampbellHOST
Mm-hmm.
P
17:35Peter LudwigGUEST
But yeah, in terms of what does it take to remove a safety driver, it is, it's the safety case, and it's, it's proving out, uh, the mate- mean time between failures, the MTBF.
P
17:43Peter LudwigGUEST
Um, and, and then there's also a, a, a, a very rigorous systems engineering aspect of this.
P
17:49Peter LudwigGUEST
And so systems-
Podcast 884 - iPhone Folds, DDR5 Rises, LG Listens, and AI Destroys + Vulnerable Plex, GOG Box & DLSS 5
B
14:08Brett Van SpruenbergPANELIST
Yeah.
S
14:08Sebastian PeakHOST
What's the MTBF on an LGA 1951? We'll have to ask Intel.
B
14:14Brett Van SpruenbergPANELIST
Yeah.
S
14:14Sebastian PeakHOST
These are the questions that Anand isn't around to ask anymore, so it's up to us to-
S
14:19Sebastian PeakHOST
Hey, hey, uh, Francois in the chats, uh, LGA-
J
14:22Jeremy HellstromPANELIST
He's there
S
14:23Sebastian PeakHOST
... 1951 MTBF.
B
14:24Brett Van SpruenbergPANELIST
He is there.
SOR 1207 Weibull is Useful
K
16:52Kirk GrayHOST
Just give me a number.
K
16:54Kirk GrayHOST
And, you know, something close to your heart, MTBF.
K
17:01Kirk GrayHOST
You know how that's been misused over decades.
K
17:05Kirk GrayHOST
And still being misused.
K
17:07Kirk GrayHOST
And they're still poisoning.
K
17:08Kirk GrayHOST
And I still see it on LinkedIn.
K
17:10Kirk GrayHOST
How to effectively use MTBF and all this other stuff.
K
17:13Kirk GrayHOST
And I just go, guys, you know, and again, all the...
Reliability Engineering and Influence
F
2:15Fred SchenkelbergHOST
And part of that is to, at the start, is to reduce the uncertainty.
F
2:23Fred SchenkelbergHOST
So where is it are we going? What direction are we going? And from our perspective, is this product, does this product need to be as good as our last product? Does it need to be as good or worse or good as better as our competitors' products? Do we have a specific goal? Hopefully not MTBF, but let's say it's, You know, 98% reliable over five years in a home environment.
F
2:53Fred SchenkelbergHOST
And I'm thinking of my inkjet printer sitting over there that just finished printing.
F
2:59Fred SchenkelbergHOST
You know, with a small home office kind of load on it and use on it.
SOR 1205 Choosing the Right Reliability Metrics — Part 2
C
0:42Chris JacksonHOST
We were talking about reliability metrics in different industries and different sectors.
C
0:49Chris JacksonHOST
And we talked about consumer products where warranty reliability is important, electronic components where they have this crazy reliability metric called FITS and the defense sector as well, which is madly obsessed with the MTBF.
C
1:06Chris JacksonHOST
And we realized that there's actually a lot more to talk about.
C
1:08Chris JacksonHOST
And I think two of the things that we want to talk about in terms of reliability metrics in this Reliability Metrics Part 2 podcast is medical devices and software.