Skip to main content
Mean time between failures

Mean time between failures

Search complete. 14 mentions across 9 episodes found for "Mean time between failures".

Oct 2, 2026

Fred SchenkelbergHOST
4:04
He showed me all these data sheets.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
4:05
They all had 50,000 hour MTBF in bold with a box around it and stuff, and, and, like, all these things, from itty bitty fans that fit on a single component up to great big blowers that fit on a great big box.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
4:19
They all were exactly 50K.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
4:22
And I'm like, "Well, that's amazing that you engineered them all to be the same." He goes, "What do you mean? That's just the thing on a spread- on a data sheet.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
7:22
But some of that is pre...
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
7:26
Part of it is...
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
7:27
And I got this the other day from a, a comment, was, why is MTBF and MTTF and all this stuff and fit rates so prevalent? And, uh, my immediate response was, because it's so easy to get what appears to be a good answer, and then you don't have to worry about it.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
7:44
Except reality doesn't care what makes you feel good.
Rohan DharmakumarHOST
39:39
Let's get lots of information in one shot and then give the results.
Rohan DharmakumarHOST
39:45
Because they are optimized for high throughput, you know, the way to kind of look at mainframe success is through this very interesting term called MTBF, which is mean time between failure.
Rohan DharmakumarHOST
39:58
It is a term that captures how long has a computer been operating before there is a failure.
Rohan DharmakumarHOST
40:05
And can you guess that for mainframes, that time MTBF is often measured in decades.
Rohan DharmakumarHOST
40:12
As in, if you commission a mainframe today, it may not go down for the next 10 years, 20 years or 30 years because it is engineered for reliability and throughput.
Rohan DharmakumarHOST
40:22
Back then in the 1960s and 70s, IBM was largely importing, refurbishing second-hand computers from developed markets.
Sec GuyHOST
5:19
For the senior viewers, you must also monitor your reliability metrics.
Sec GuyHOST
5:25
MTBF or meantime between failures tells you how reliable your hardware is.
Sec GuyHOST
5:32
The higher the number, the better.
Sec GuyHOST
5:36
MTTR, or mean time to repair, tells you how fast your team is.
Ev KontsevoyGUEST
20:50
So, for example, you have like machines that behave in a very, very predictable way.
Ev KontsevoyGUEST
20:57
And when manufacturer makes a machine like a computer, they put like MTBF rating, mean time between failure.
Ev KontsevoyGUEST
21:03
So you look at that number and then you look at that how many machines you have.
Ev KontsevoyGUEST
21:07
And it gives you like actually pretty decent numbers.
Harry CampbellHOST
17:34
Mm-hmm.
Peter LudwigGUEST
17:35
But yeah, in terms of what does it take to remove a safety driver, it is, it's the safety case, and it's, it's proving out, uh, the mate- mean time between failures, the MTBF.
Peter LudwigGUEST
17:43
Um, and, and then there's also a, a, a, a very rigorous systems engineering aspect of this.
Peter LudwigGUEST
17:49
And so systems-
Brett Van SpruenbergPANELIST
14:08
Yeah.
Sebastian PeakHOST
14:08
What's the MTBF on an LGA 1951? We'll have to ask Intel.
Brett Van SpruenbergPANELIST
14:14
Yeah.
Sebastian PeakHOST
14:14
These are the questions that Anand isn't around to ask anymore, so it's up to us to-
Sebastian PeakHOST
14:19
Hey, hey, uh, Francois in the chats, uh, LGA-
Jeremy HellstromPANELIST
14:22
He's there
Sebastian PeakHOST
14:23
... 1951 MTBF.
Brett Van SpruenbergPANELIST
14:24
He is there.
Kirk GrayHOST
16:52
Just give me a number.
Kirk GrayHOST
16:54
And, you know, something close to your heart, MTBF.
Kirk GrayHOST
17:01
You know how that's been misused over decades.
Kirk GrayHOST
17:05
And still being misused.
Kirk GrayHOST
17:07
And they're still poisoning.
Kirk GrayHOST
17:08
And I still see it on LinkedIn.
Kirk GrayHOST
17:10
How to effectively use MTBF and all this other stuff.
Kirk GrayHOST
17:13
And I just go, guys, you know, and again, all the...
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
2:15
And part of that is to, at the start, is to reduce the uncertainty.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
2:23
So where is it are we going? What direction are we going? And from our perspective, is this product, does this product need to be as good as our last product? Does it need to be as good or worse or good as better as our competitors' products? Do we have a specific goal? Hopefully not MTBF, but let's say it's, You know, 98% reliable over five years in a home environment.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
2:53
And I'm thinking of my inkjet printer sitting over there that just finished printing.
Fred SchenkelbergHOST
2:59
You know, with a small home office kind of load on it and use on it.
Chris JacksonHOST
0:42
We were talking about reliability metrics in different industries and different sectors.
Chris JacksonHOST
0:49
And we talked about consumer products where warranty reliability is important, electronic components where they have this crazy reliability metric called FITS and the defense sector as well, which is madly obsessed with the MTBF.
Chris JacksonHOST
1:06
And we realized that there's actually a lot more to talk about.
Chris JacksonHOST
1:08
And I think two of the things that we want to talk about in terms of reliability metrics in this Reliability Metrics Part 2 podcast is medical devices and software.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.