Mr. Moser?

Mr.

Chief Justice, and may it please the court, this case arises out of an enemy attack on U.S. military forces on a foreign battlefield in time of war.

Petitioners sued Flohr under South Carolina tort law for failing to prevent that act of war.

Those state law claims are preempted because they conflict with uniquely federal interests.

Petitioners' claims interfere with the federal government's exclusive war-making powers.

The Constitution vests all war powers in the federal government and expressly withdraws from the states the power to engage in war.

So wouldn't the rule that we adopt have to deal with all three of those situations?