Many-worlds interpretation

Uh, yeah, basically this is like coming from theoretical physicists like, uh, Michio Kaku and, um, who else? Uh, Neil Tys- Tyson, Neil deGrasse Tyson, and these other, uh, quantum physicists and theoretical physicists.

The MWI proposes that every quantum event results in a branching or splitting of the universe.

For every possible outcome of a quantum measurement, there exists a branch where that outcome actually occurs.

This leads to an unimaginably large, ever-expanding multiverse of universes where every quantum possibility plays out.

But if such a civilization existed, they might actually do it.

In a way, the Many Worlds Interpretation is a kind of multiverse simulation.

The simulators are running every possibility, and we are in one branch among countless others.

the connection between quantum mechanics and simulation theory becomes tighter the more you examine it.

But due to the term multiverse, it encompasses several distinct scientific models, which advocates typically categorized by the specific physics equations that led them to the hypothesis to begin with.

So quantum mechanics, the many worlds interpretation, This model proposes that the universe branches into a new reality every time a quantum measurement or event occurs, rendering all possible histories and futures physically real.

Hugh Everett III, the pioneer who originally formulated the Many Worlds Interpretation in 1957 as a way to solve the quantum measurement paradox without requiring a wave function collapse, as well as David Deutsch, a pioneer of quantum computing, who put Everett's concepts into a more mathematically secure framework, arguing that the multiverse is required to explain how quantum computers process information.

Sean Carroll, a theoretical physicist who extensively advocates for the Everettian view, arguing that many worlds is the most literal and elegant reading of standard quantum mechanics.

Cosmology, or eternal inflation and bubble universes, this framework suggests that the rapid expansion after the Big Bang never truly stopped everywhere.

There are some details that are important.

So what Mineral Worlds basically says is that everything that can happen within the laws of physics will or has happened.

So for example, there's a branch of the multiverse, so sort of like the tree of all the universes that is ever growing, Well, there's a branch in there.

There's a universe where, for example, the Nazis won World War II.

So every time you have particle interaction, you have branching.

So if you take the general quantum mechanic example of the cat in the box, where Schrodinger's cat ends, You look at the cats, well, usually, generally speaking, the general analogy is that, well, the cat is either dead or alive, and the quantum states of the cat collapses into being dead or alive when you look at it.

Now, what Many Worlds says is that that's not true, and that instead there are two universes, one where the cat is alive, one where the cat is dead, and that if you say the cat is dead, then it means that you are in the cat is dead universe, and the other way around, if the cat is alive.

Okay, so again, being a huge sci-fi fan myself, as someone just wrote in the comments here, I don't know if you've seen the shows, but Sliders and Dark Matter.

... kind of.

Okay, so you're going for like an MWI type.

You're going for a many worlds-

Yes