I'm so impressed that they caught this issue.

Despite what Caroline was saying earlier about a lot of the issues going deeper, from my perspective, I was really impressed by... how few violations there were on the C3D site.

Like, there weren't anything that was blocking people from doing things.

It was mostly just tidying things up.

And that was the main thing that stuck out to me, is we were mostly helping with, like, alt text and things like that um that aren't really you know catastrophic or anything like that but yeah i was i was really impressed that people were you know if you don't have the background and you don't know what the like what guidelines are exactly um that you're that those participants were still able to just go through it and and find issues that uh that absolutely match up to the WCAG violations.

But they're mostly things like alt text and there's some interesting ones like we talked about with the disjointed headings and the title attribute which is causing unexpected behavior.

And those were the most interesting to a nerdy person like me.

What do you like to see in a digital accessibility tester? What makes a good tester?