Khilafat Movement

whether shooting down two thousand unarmed civilians saved general dyer

from folly or not though it may be an interesting question was not the main point the significant thing was that dyer believed as many englishmen believed that such action as his was necessary to cow india i was in england at the time that dyer's case was being discussed and well remember how strong was the feeling in imperialist circles that dyer had performed a courageous and necessary exploit the point of view is interesting when considered in connection with the affirmation which the same imperialists frequently make that india is loyal to england and that england's mission in india is one of peace and humanity it is only fair to add however that the prevailing english sentiment was condemnation of dyer's deed as an unwarranted bit of frightfulness in india of course the amritsar victims were martyrs and dyer's deed a bloody crime the blood of martyrs is always a stimulant to nationalism A third powerful factor was the Khilafat movement.

When in 1920 the Great Powers imposed on Turkey a Carthaginian peace, dismembering the Ottoman Empire, great was the anger of the Muslims in India, who had supported England in the war in the belief that Great Britain was a friend of Islam.

There developed in India a fanatical Mohammedan agitation against the dismemberment of Turkey, because Turkey was Mohammedan and the Turkish Sultan was Caliph of Islam.

The blood of martyrs is always a stimulant to nationalism.

A third powerful factor was the Khilafat movement.

When in 1920 the great powers imposed on Turkey a Carthaginian peace, dismembering the Ottoman Empire, great was the anger of the Muslims in India who had supported England in the war in the belief that Great Britain was a friend of Islam.

There developed in India a fanatical Mohammedan agitation against the dismemberment of Turkey, because Turkey was Mohammedan and the Turkish Sultan was Caliph of Islam.

The blood of martyrs is always a stimulant to nationalism.

A third powerful factor was the Khilafat movement.

When in 1920 the great powers imposed on Turkey a Carthaginian peace, dismembering the Ottoman Empire, great was the anger of the Muslims in India who had supported England in the war in the belief that Great Britain was a friend of Islam.

There developed in India a fanatical Mohammedan agitation against the dismemberment of Turkey, because Turkey was Mohammedan and the Turkish Sultan was Caliph of Islam.

The blood of martyrs is always a stimulant to nationalism.

A third powerful factor was the Khilafat movement.

When in nineteen twenty the great powers imposed on Turkey a Carthaginian peace, dismembering the Ottoman Empire, great was the anger of the Muslims in India who had supported England in the war in the belief that Great Britain was a friend of Islam.

There developed in India a fanatical Mohammedan agitation against the dismemberment of Turkey because Turkey was Mohammedan and the Turkish sultan was caliph of Islam.

The blood of martyrs is always a stimulant to nationalism.

A third powerful factor was the Khilafat movement.

When in 1920 the great powers imposed on Turkey a Carthaginian peace, dismembering the Ottoman Empire, great was the anger of the Muslims in India, who had supported England in the war in the belief that Great Britain was a friend of Islam.

There developed in India a fanatical Mohammedan agitation against the dismemberment of Turkey, because Turkey was Mohammedan and the Turkish Sultan was Caliph of Islam.

The blood of martyrs is always a stimulant to nationalism.

A third powerful factor was the Khilafat movement.

When in nineteen twenty the great powers imposed on Turkey a Carthaginian peace, dismembering the Ottoman Empire, great was the anger of the Muslims in India who had supported England in the war in the belief that Great Britain was a friend of Islam.

There developed in India a fanatical Mohammedan agitation against the dismemberment of Turkey because Turkey was Mohammedan and the Turkish sultan was caliph of Islam.