Skip to main content
Kannon Shanmugam

Kannon Shanmugam

American lawyerWikipedia

Search complete. 14 mentions across 10 episodes found for "Kannon Shanmugam".

Oct 12, 2026

Mary ReichardHOST
8:15
In their view, local courts cannot set worldwide emissions rules.
Mary ReichardHOST
8:20
Kannon Shanmugam is the attorney for the companies.
Kannon ShanmugamSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
8:23
This case involves an unprecedented effort to use state law to regulate global conduct.
Kannon ShanmugamSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
8:28
Boulder is suing petitioners under Colorado law on the theory that their global conduct increased the global use of fossil fuels, which led to an increase in global greenhouse gas emissions, which contributed to global climate change, which resulted in global harms.
Sarah SchauerHOST
35:44
County Commissioners of Boulder County, a case that could give fossil fuel companies a get out of jail free card for the harms caused by climate change.
Sarah SchauerHOST
35:52
That is not exactly how Kannon Shanmugam, who represents Suncor and ExxonMobil, another petitioner in the case, framed the argument.
Sarah SchauerHOST
35:59
He said that dozens of active lawsuits that use state tort law to sue fossil fuel companies for damages because of their role in causing climate change are superseded by federal law, federal preemption.
Sarah SchauerHOST
36:10
Quote, "This case and others like it reflect an all-too-regrettable trend of trying to resolve political issues in court rather than leaving them to the political branches where they belong," Mr. Shanmugam argued.
David FrenchHOST
5:34
So two things.
David FrenchHOST
5:34
One, if I'm Kannon, you know, our good friend Kannon Shanmugam arguing the case, there were two things that were kind of like, oh crap moments for me.
David FrenchHOST
5:42
Oh crap moment number one, before the oral argument, Alito recuses.
David FrenchHOST
5:45
So all of a sudden, all Boulder has to do is count to four.

23 MINS LATER

David FrenchHOST
29:01
Okay, that, that's cowardice right there.
David FrenchHOST
29:04
So let's just be a little, a more all-encompassing in our definition.
David FrenchHOST
29:08
But I'm glad we're going back to this because I still, you know, in reflecting on our con- conversation with, with Sharif, I'm still in the same place of being-- I'm, I'm very grateful that Justice Alito articulated his philosophy at such length and volume, and I'm more, uh, I'm more alarmed by the, quote-unquote, "insecure originalism" point that he made than even when we were talking to our good friend Sharif, 'cause that whole frame is rinsing through this...
David FrenchHOST
29:40
E- even the very name, insecure, imputes a motive.
Scott WallaceHOST
27:15
It also alleged they should help cover costs tied to wildfires, floods, and drought.
Scott WallaceHOST
27:20
Attorney Kannon Shanmugam addressed the justices.
Scott WallaceHOST
27:23
He said that if Boulder's claims proceed, some 90,000 municipalities could set national and international energy policy.
Scott WallaceHOST
27:31
He said they could do it by asking juries to impose damages on fossil fuel producers.
Dan ProftHOST
36:49
And just to hear the response effectively, I mean, that's one point that was raised there at the end.
Dan ProftHOST
36:56
But also, uh, I think by Kavanaugh, um, the, um, Suncor Energy Council, Cannon, um, Shanmugam was very good.
Kannon ShanmugamSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
37:09
First, the breadth of Boulder's theory here is astonishing.
Kannon ShanmugamSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
37:14
First, there is no limit under Boulder's theory on who could be sued.
Ali RoginCORRESPONDENT
3:38
Mm.
Amy HoweGUEST
3:38
But there are, as Kannon Shanmugam, who represented the energy companies today at the Supreme Court said, there are more than two dozen cases around the country right now relying on similar theories to what Boulder has brought in this case, the idea that the energy companies were deceptive in their marketing and in their sales of fossil fuels.
Amy HoweGUEST
3:59
And to the extent that the Supreme Court says that Boulder's claims can't go forward, it would mean that those can't as well, and that was part of the argument that Shanmugam made at the Supreme Court today, was that we're not really just talking about this case, we're talking about lots of others, and potentially billions of dollars of damages around the country.
Ali RoginCORRESPONDENT
4:19
Uh, today's arguments were the first of the term, but there's going to be many others.
Ali RoginCORRESPONDENT
2:24
And if the Court ends up siding against Boulder, what does that mean for other lawsuits against industries that, that, you know, create pollution? Does it mean they're all kind of not going any further?
Amy HoweGUEST
2:35
It depends on exactly what the Court says, obviously, but there are, as Kannon Shanmugam, who represented the energy companies today at the Supreme Court said, there are more than two dozen cases around the country right now relying on similar theories to what Boulder has brought in this case, the idea that the energy companies were deceptive in their marketing and in their sales of fossil fuels.
Amy HoweGUEST
2:59
And to the extent that the Supreme Court says that Boulder's claims can't go forward, it would mean that those can't as well, and that was part of the argument that Shanmugam made at the Supreme Court today, was that we're not really just talking about this case, we're talking about lots of others and potentially billions of dollars of damages around the country.
Ali RoginCORRESPONDENT
3:19
Uh, today's arguments were the first of the term, but there's going to be many others.
Robin YoungHOST
15:45
Uh, the companies argue that's a federal, not a state issue.
Robin YoungHOST
15:50
And today, Justice Brett Kavanaugh had this to say, seeming to agree with one of the lawyers for the companies, Kannon Shanmugam.
Brett KavanaughSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
15:57
This Court has said four times that interstate air and water pollution are federal, are matters for federal law unless Congress preserves, or in Mr. Shanmugam's words, authorizes state law.
Robin YoungHOST
16:10
A- and we also heard from Justice Elena Kagan, who brought up comparisons between this climate lawsuit and actions against tobacco and opioid companies.
Amy HoweGUEST
2:35
It depends on exactly what the Court says, obviously.
Amy HoweGUEST
2:37
But there are, as Kannon Shanmugam, who represented the energy companies today at the Supreme Court, said, there are more than two dozen cases around the country right now relying on similar theories to what Boulder has brought in this case, the idea that the energy companies were deceptive in their marketing and in their sales of fossil fuels.
Amy HoweGUEST
2:59
And to the extent that the Supreme Court says that Boulder's claims can't go forward, it would mean that those can't as well, and that was part of the argument that Shanmugam made at the Supreme Court today, was that we're not really just talking about this case, we're talking about lots of others and potentially billions of dollars of damages around the country.
Ali RoginCORRESPONDENT
3:19
Uh, today's arguments were the first of the term, but there's going to be many others.
David FrenchHOST
56:18
I don't know.
Elie HonigGUEST
56:19
If, if that person, if Kannon Shanmugam or Elizabeth Prelogar had sold their best friends to their likely deaths, then yes, [laughs] exactly right.
David FrenchHOST
56:28
That's the wrinkle in the confirmation problem.
David FrenchHOST
56:31
I'm just-- So, so, I mean, you have somebody who just executes people who are-- upset him, right? So, I mean, is it okay? And, and look, I, I know Kannon and Lisa and all of those guys, they would never sell out their best friends.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.