Justice Humphreys

Um, but it was, uh, Mr.

Justice Humphreys again who, uh, didn't proceed, um- And it's centered around whether or not a project was, uh, eligible for an environmental impact assessment report or not, um, which changes the nature of a project.

So no solar farm that I know of anyway, um, has to complete, uh, an EIAR, and it's quite well-established in the solar industry that they don't.

Uh, but this-- when it str- when it comes back to it, this was challenged, and this was the basis of the challenge a-among many other core grounds as well.

Unarguable.

And Mr Justice Humphreys declared that the march should lawfully go ahead.

Let

me make this more productive because you're stating the obvious of what has happened.

We went to the Court of Appeal.

The Court of Appeal turned that upside down, inside out and discharged the injunction.

Mr Justice Humphreys then sat and heard the full case.

the full case that your side of the argument wanted to make.

Mr.

Justice Humphreys summed up the case to the jury in his impartial way, and then sent them out to consider which of three verdicts they should return.

Guilty of murder, guilty of manslaughter, or not guilty of any offense.

For two hours, the courtroom buzzed with the chatter of the