Skip to main content
Julia Azari

Julia Azari

American political scientistWikipedia

Search complete. 3 mentions across 3 episodes found for "Julia Azari".

Oct 18, 2026

Philip BumpGUEST
38:03
I'll say a few things.
Philip BumpGUEST
38:05
First of all, we are in a moment of what the political scientist Julia Azari calls weak parties and strong partisanship.
Philip BumpGUEST
38:11
People are not particularly interested in being members of parties, either Democrat or Republican Party, but they have very strong feelings about the parties and about politics.
Philip BumpGUEST
38:19
One of the things that we see from independent voters is that often they are independent not because they don't like either party, but because they don't really like parties and they really dislike the other party.
Elizabeth SaundersGUEST
37:52
infrastructure, like the RNC and the DNC, which at the moment are just totally hollowed out entities.
Elizabeth SaundersGUEST
37:58
I mean, Julia Azari has said strong partisanship and weak parties.
Elizabeth SaundersGUEST
38:02
And Nobody likes the RNC,
Perry BaconHOST
38:06
but
Nathan KalmoeGUEST
22:15
And the tendency is to punish whoever is in power and to say, well, these guys aren't getting it done, so we need to try something else.
Nathan KalmoeGUEST
22:25
And that's what leads to this alternation, not wild ideological swings, but um uh and i want to shout out julia azari who's a professor at marquette who's a great political commentator and some of her work is on on mandates about how election results get interpreted and they are certainly being interpreted in ways that assume these kinds of ideological swings and those assumptions really matter you can see all of the not just corporate, but also civil society shifts against DEI that came even before the Trump administration came into office in 2025, January, where they just started abandoning their commitments that they had made in recent years because they felt like the political winds had shifted.
Nathan KalmoeGUEST
23:19
That's an ideological interpretation of the results that really wasn't warranted.
Nathan KalmoeGUEST
23:26
And I should say, you know, when we're talking about getting back to Francesca Hong's.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.