Skip to main content
John Sirica

John Sirica

American lawyer and juristWikipedia

Search complete. 3 mentions across 2 episodes found for "John Sirica".

Oct 2, 2026

Eric Von HaesslerHOST
43:53
Uh, network of career politicians, the Senate committee, and the special prosecutor's office to realign political power.
Eric Von HaesslerHOST
44:00
He asserts that trial judges, most notably Judge John Sirica...
Eric Von HaesslerHOST
44:03
I remember him being a big judge in that.
Eric Von HaesslerHOST
44:05
Watergate was the first thing that I noticed in the news.
Greg RussPANELIST
44:47
[laughs]
Eric Von HaesslerHOST
44:48
... a break-in happened.
Eric Von HaesslerHOST
44:49
Uh, so, uh, he says, uh, the Judge John Sirica and prosecutors like Leon Jaworski, I remember that name, held forbidden secret ex parte meetings to coordinate strategies against the defense and predetermine the outcome of trials.
Eric Von HaesslerHOST
45:03
Shepherd claims that prosecutors suppressed evidence favorable to the defendants, lied to grand juries and congressional committees, and delayed or manipulated indictments.
ThomasGUEST
149:56
And he was kind of made for, you know, conspiratorial narratives in media, like the man of Liddy.
ThomasGUEST
150:02
I mean, after the White House plumbers were arrested um a particularly ambitious judge named john sirica colloquial colloquially anonymously known as maximum john because he was uh very much like a rockefeller laws or a judge who was known for his absolutely draconian sentences um he was threatening to slap uh the white house plumbers with life sentences like with parole but just the same if they refuse to turn state's evidence, that's quite literally insane.
ThomasGUEST
150:42
You know, to say, well, you're gonna lock people up for an amount of, you know, 20 years to life for a petty burglary, you know, regardless of the implications vis-a-vis a sitting presidential administration.
ThomasGUEST
150:58
I mean, things like this, you know, that doesn't just smack a malicious prosecution, but I mean, that's an obvious matter of judicial overreach, you know, and it goes to show you kind of at every level, this scandal, if we can call it a scandal and not, you know, a coup, which is kind of more probably what it was.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.