Johanan ben Nuri

So these people say, no, we saw them both the same day.

Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri said they are false witnesses, as it is impossible to see the new moon so soon after the last sighting of the waning moon, which is correct.

Rabbi Yochanan ben Nuri was right.

However, when they arrived in Yavne, Rabban Gamliel accepted them as witnesses without concern.

So Gamaliel II accepts these witnesses, which are saying something astronomically impossible.

We learned that in the last Mishnah.

Rabbi Yochanan Ben Nuri, Rabbi Yochanan Ben Nuri said, They didn't say, Chachamim didn't say, They didn't say bones that combine together to be the size of a seora.

Chachamim said one bone has to be one.

So if it got cut down, sorry.

Don't say [Hebrew].

[Hebrew] we're going with the shitah of Rav Yochanan ben Nuri.

So we thought we had a kasha on Rav Nahman, and the Gemara deflects it.

[Hebrew] this whole halacha that when you rip up, the [Hebrew] is only where he did not leave intact the amount needed for a mafiris, for a kerchief, to use it as a small, a small baguette.

But a spoon was designed to be used only when being held, and therefore it's still subject to [speaking Hebrew] even if it can't stand on its own because it's being used in the way it's designed.

Rabbi Yochanan Ben Nuri says, "You're right.

That's true by [speaking Hebrew] but by [speaking Hebrew] didn't go that far." They said the spoon, if it's used, if it can stand on its own and contain things, then it's [speaking Hebrew] But if it's, if it can't stand on its own, even though it can be used, it can be, uh, hold things when being used in its normal way when holding it, it's not [speaking Hebrew] since we're only talking about [speaking Hebrew].

So again, the Mishnah tells us that a mirror, a glass mirror is [speaking Hebrew] because it doesn't contain things.

But if it was originally made as a mirror and it also functioned as a secondary function, non-primary function, as a bowl, then it's still not subject to [speaking Hebrew] because it's primarily a mirror.

A s- glass spoon that when you put on the table, it can still contain things on its own, then everyone agrees that's subject to [speaking Hebrew] But if not, Rabbi [speaking Hebrew] says it's subject to [speaking Hebrew] because it's being used as it's supposed to, as a spoon.

Rabbi Yochanan Ben Nuri says, "No, since it can't stand on its own and hold things while it's standing on its own, then it is not subject to any [speaking Hebrew]."

They have three different opinions.

Rabbi Yechem Ben-Nuri did with three sheeters.

Rabbi Akiva says, you do it like that.

You combine the three middle brachas, HaMalchihah and the sheifas, and Malchihah is the theme of Rosh Hashanah.

So that's why you combine these two together.

Malchihah is with Rosh Hashanah combined together.

Rabbi Yechem Ben-Nuri felt not so.

You should say Malchihah is together with Aton Kodesh, Rishon Kodesh, with Rosh Hashanah.

The skin of a dead man, the skin of a domestic pig, certain other animals, the skin of the hooves, the fetus, and the tail.

Rabbi Echanan Ben-Nuri says, the eight shratzim of the Torah, the skin does not have a din of basah.

Gemara.

Mid-Raisah, the skin of a dead man is not mitameh, but mid-Rabbanon, it is.

Once you passed over the chazah, all you have left is the hide on the neck.

So, that Rabi Ichran Ben Nuri says, Ein Echiber, right? Ein Echiber means that it's no longer a handle.

Same, similar question.

Why? It's leather, it's hide, it's strong.