Skip to main content
Jens Rasmussen

Jens Rasmussen

ResearcherWikipedia

Search complete. 7 mentions across 4 episodes found for "Jens Rasmussen".

Sep 11, 2026

Tristan CaseyGUEST
27:41
So let's explore that in a bit more detail as we come to some parts here.
Tristan CaseyGUEST
27:46
So flexibility is important, and I sort of, again, link this to a really important scholar called Jens Rasmussen, who you might have heard of.
Tristan CaseyGUEST
27:55
He was one of the fathers of sort of safety to and resilience engineering in a way, because he started to push us to think differently about what creates safety.
Tristan CaseyGUEST
28:09
The traditional way of thinking about what creates safety is pushing operations away from the unsafe kind of zone and putting restrictions and applying constraints that lock the uncertainty down.
Todd ConklinGUEST
8:03
Because one of the things, Musa, that's very interesting to me is that when we started this discussion, With Tony Machara and some of the info guys, James Reason, the original Clambake clan.
Todd ConklinGUEST
8:17
I mean, all kind of the people, Jens Rasmussen, all those guys were a part of this discussion a long time ago.
Todd ConklinGUEST
8:25
And when we started this discussion, it's really funny because we started thinking we could manage human error.
Todd ConklinGUEST
8:33
That this was about management of error.
Gareth LockHOST
2:32
Cause is constructed, not discovered.
Gareth LockHOST
2:35
Decades ago, Jens Rasmussen, one of the most famous researchers in safety science, made an observation that has been confirmed repeatedly since.
Gareth LockHOST
2:44
When we explain an accident in causal terms, we are not reading the structure of reality.
Gareth LockHOST
2:50
We are matching the flow of events against a set of mental models or experiences that feel familiar to us.
Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
1:32
It was to ask the bigger questions.
Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
1:34
How did the system fail? What decisions, pressures, and organizational influences lined up to create the conditions for the incident? And most importantly, what can we learn? In this episode, the students have examined one of aviation's most significant accidents, American Airlines Flight 191, using Rasmussen's AXIMAP framework.
Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
2:02
Their discussion demonstrates exactly the kind of systems thinking that sits at the heart of human factors.
Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
2:09
Now, I know most of our Hema Factors Economic Society listeners are already familiar with these tools.

7 MINS LATER

Ezekiel WattGUEST
9:30
Nah, I'm just kidding.
Ezekiel WattGUEST
9:32
It's 1997, and Carlo would know this.
Ezekiel WattGUEST
9:34
And this guy, Jens Rasmussen, is investigating accidents in transportation.
Ezekiel WattGUEST
9:40
He's a real nerd, and he starts asking really good questions and making some really good points, including... to design safer systems, we still witness severe large-scale accidents.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.