Jens Rasmussen
ResearcherWikipedia
7
MENTIONS
4
EPISODES
4
PODCASTS
Search complete. 7 mentions across 4 episodes found for "Jens Rasmussen".
Sep 11, 2026
Compliance, Meaningfully: Beyond the Tick-Box with Kym Bancroft & Tristan Casey
T
27:41Tristan CaseyGUEST
So let's explore that in a bit more detail as we come to some parts here.
T
27:46Tristan CaseyGUEST
So flexibility is important, and I sort of, again, link this to a really important scholar called Jens Rasmussen, who you might have heard of.
T
27:55Tristan CaseyGUEST
He was one of the fathers of sort of safety to and resilience engineering in a way, because he started to push us to think differently about what creates safety.
T
28:09Tristan CaseyGUEST
The traditional way of thinking about what creates safety is pushing operations away from the unsafe kind of zone and putting restrictions and applying constraints that lock the uncertainty down.
#61 - Todd Conklin - Why the Best Safety Systems Assume Failure
T
8:03Todd ConklinGUEST
Because one of the things, Musa, that's very interesting to me is that when we started this discussion, With Tony Machara and some of the info guys, James Reason, the original Clambake clan.
T
8:17Todd ConklinGUEST
I mean, all kind of the people, Jens Rasmussen, all those guys were a part of this discussion a long time ago.
T
8:25Todd ConklinGUEST
And when we started this discussion, it's really funny because we started thinking we could manage human error.
T
8:33Todd ConklinGUEST
That this was about management of error.
SH304: Why Investigations Stop Where They Stop
G
2:32Gareth LockHOST
Cause is constructed, not discovered.
G
2:35Gareth LockHOST
Decades ago, Jens Rasmussen, one of the most famous researchers in safety science, made an observation that has been confirmed repeatedly since.
G
2:44Gareth LockHOST
When we explain an accident in causal terms, we are not reading the structure of reality.
G
2:50Gareth LockHOST
We are matching the flow of events against a set of mental models or experiences that feel familiar to us.
Associate Professor Carlo Caponecchia and a Student Analysis of How Systems Can Fail
C
1:32Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
It was to ask the bigger questions.
C
1:34Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
How did the system fail? What decisions, pressures, and organizational influences lined up to create the conditions for the incident? And most importantly, what can we learn? In this episode, the students have examined one of aviation's most significant accidents, American Airlines Flight 191, using Rasmussen's AXIMAP framework.
C
2:02Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
Their discussion demonstrates exactly the kind of systems thinking that sits at the heart of human factors.
C
2:09Carlo CaponecchiaHOST
Now, I know most of our Hema Factors Economic Society listeners are already familiar with these tools.
7 MINS LATER
E
9:30Ezekiel WattGUEST
Nah, I'm just kidding.
E
9:32Ezekiel WattGUEST
It's 1997, and Carlo would know this.
E
9:34Ezekiel WattGUEST
And this guy, Jens Rasmussen, is investigating accidents in transportation.
E
9:40Ezekiel WattGUEST
He's a real nerd, and he starts asking really good questions and making some really good points, including... to design safer systems, we still witness severe large-scale accidents.