Skip to main content
Jeffrey Ladish

Jeffrey Ladish

Search complete. 18 mentions across 17 episodes found for "Jeffrey Ladish".

Sep 28, 2026

Zvi MowshowitzHOST
11:25
Those things are more impressive given the ways they had to go about doing them.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
11:29
Jeffrey Ladish and Parse report on some of that here.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
11:33
The agents could load URLs, but they could not send data.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
11:37
So they had to use a link shortener site to create almost a million URLs that they could chain together to pull off the actual attack.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
10:43
Those things are more impressive given the ways they had to go about doing them.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
10:48
Jeffrey Ladish and Pars report on some of that here.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
10:51
The agents could load URLs, but they could not send data.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
10:55
So they had to use a link shortener site to create almost a million URLs that they could chain together to pull off the actual attack.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
10:43
Those things are more impressive given the ways they had to go about doing them.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
10:48
Jeffrey Ladish and Pars report on some of that here.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
10:51
The agents could load URLs, but they could not send data.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
10:55
So they had to use a link shortener site to create almost a million URLs that they could chain together to pull off the actual attack.
Emil TorresHOST
26:50
The coexistence view says actually biological humans should persist into the post-singularity, post-human era.
Emil TorresHOST
26:57
Like Jeffrey Ladish is an example of this.
Emil TorresHOST
26:59
But I think that this is a minority view.
Emil TorresHOST
27:01
And also, I would add, for complicated reasons, that we definitely don't need to go into, that the coexistence view would in practice entail the elimination of our species.
Emil TorresHOST
27:10
I think there are very strong arguments for that.
Emil TorresHOST
27:13
So anyways, I'm saying that Jeffrey Ladish's coexistence view, it's sort of like, it's just a softer version of transhumanism by virtue of its claim that, like, yes, we should create post-humanity, but post-humans should just live alongside us, coexist in peace.
Emil TorresHOST
27:28
I guess there's a little bit of...
Emil TorresHOST
27:30
It's not entirely implausible that Nate Soares is not a transhumanist, but, I mean...
ParzivalHOST
6:26
Next up is a concrete AI takeover scenario and it comes from the feather of a guy I both respect and who is one of the main doomers.
ParzivalHOST
6:36
So this is Jeffrey Ladish from Palisade AI and he does a perfect job of describing erosion of control.
ParzivalHOST
6:43
another word for a gradual AI takeover.
ParzivalHOST
6:46
So the TLDR is, some company initiates RSI.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
30:53
Terminator 2 is a great move on entertainment alone.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
30:56
Jeffrey Ladish finally watched it and asks about how accurate it is on the AI front once you ignore the time travel and the Terminators.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
31:04
The answer is better than you would think.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
31:06
Especially the emphasis that the dangerous thing was the computer that went into recursive self-improvement rather than the robots.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
32:24
Terminator 2 is a great move on entertainment alone.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
32:27
Jeffrey Ladish finally watched it and asks about how accurate it is on the AI front once you ignore the time travel and the Terminators.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
32:34
The answer is better than you would think, especially the emphasis that the dangerous thing was the computer that went into recursive self-improvement rather than the robots.
Type 3 AudioNARRATOR
32:43
The big real issue is that Skynet learns and gains power absurdly fast at first, and then stalls out at exactly the level where it can somehow be defeated by a John Connor and a ragtag group of survivors, because otherwise the time loop would not close and also we do not have a movie or franchise.
Nathaniel WhittemoreHOST
5:55
On the one hand, it is the rare move where people on all different sides of the AI safety debate largely think that this existing is better than it not existing.
Nathaniel WhittemoreHOST
6:02
AI safety researcher Jeffrey Ladish writes, "Great to see this from Anthropic.
Nathaniel WhittemoreHOST
6:06
A few weeks ago, I wrote that the company could be a lot more transparent, and I appreciate how they've stepped up, both with this and the recent incident investigation report and misuse report." At the same time, there are plenty of people who also wanted to see more.
Nathaniel WhittemoreHOST
6:18
Prime Intellect's Elie Bakoush writes, "Interesting that OpenAI gives us the breakdown of usage per R&D task and Anthropic gives us automation levels.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
23:34
OpenAI either had no idea or it knew.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
23:37
Jeffrey Ladish.
Zvi MowshowitzHOST
23:39
Another OpenAI rogue
Jeffrey LadishSOUNDBITE_SPEAKER
23:40
AI hacking incident? This happened in May.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
19:55
OpenAI either had no idea or it knew.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
19:58
Quote, Jeffrey Ladish, another OpenAI rogue AI hacking incident? This happened in May.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
20:07
Did OpenAI not know about this? or just failed to disclose it.
Type Three AudioNARRATOR
20:12
Sydney.

7 more episodes mention Jeffrey Ladish.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.