
Jeffrey A. Winters
American political scientistWikipedia
6
MENTIONS
5
EPISODES
5
PODCASTS
Search complete. 6 mentions across 5 episodes found for "Jeffrey A. Winters".
Nov 1, 2026
Ep103: “The Hidden Architecture of American Oligarchy"
S
10:45speaker_0HOST
And by the late 1800s, the top 1% owned roughly half of all American wealth.
S
10:54speaker_0HOST
And so these robber barons practiced what political scientist Jeffrey Winters calls wealth defense, which When you possess vast wealth, your primary political goal is not just making more money.
S
11:11speaker_0HOST
What it is, it is protecting what you have from things like taxation and redistribution.
S
11:19speaker_0HOST
In the Gilded Age, wealth defense meant direct, blunt force corruption.
10 MINS LATER
S
21:31speaker_2UNKNOWN
logical as plausible.
S
21:32speaker_0HOST
Okay.
S
21:33speaker_0HOST
Um, Over the long term, experts like Jeffrey Winters argue we must confront the constitutional DNA itself, reforming or replacing institutions like the Senate that grant disproportionate veto power to the minority wealth, and shifting cultural narratives so that extreme wealth is no longer confused with virtue or fitness to govern.
S
21:59speaker_0HOST
History shows that majority equalizing shifts from progressive era reforms to the New Deal never happen overnight.
Democracy Is People Power | The Context
D
11:06Dorian WarrenGUEST
And Alex, you're the historian here, but I do read a lot of history because it gives me relief and solace.
D
11:14Dorian WarrenGUEST
And it reminds me that, yes, we have been under both racially authoritarian and because I know you had Jeff Winters on your podcast earlier.
D
11:24Dorian WarrenGUEST
oligarchic conditions.
D
11:26Dorian WarrenGUEST
We have been here before and it's instructive to look outside our borders at other countries in the world that are also under authoritarian oligarchic governments and how people are resisting and envisioning something better.
1695 Casey Michel UNITED STATES OF OLIGARCHY + News and Clips
C
56:51Casey MichelGUEST
But to get to Russia for just a moment.
C
56:53Casey MichelGUEST
One of the scholars that I spoke to, Jeffrey Winters, who was at Northwestern University, absolutely fascinating career he has had and a brilliant mind himself, pointed out to me that there was this weird, almost linguistic shift that took place in the 1990s at the end of the Cold War, the beginning of the post-Cold War period, where, again, for thousands of years, oligarchy – The definition of oligarchy, it didn't matter where your money came from.
C
57:20Casey MichelGUEST
It didn't matter if you were a cartel head.
C
57:21Casey MichelGUEST
It didn't matter if you were a computer salesman.
Democracy Is People Power
D
10:41Dorian WarrenGUEST
And Alex, you're the historian here, but I do read a lot of history because it gives me relief and solace.
D
10:49Dorian WarrenGUEST
And it reminds me that, yes, we have been under both racially authoritarian and because I know you had Jeff Winters on your podcast earlier, Oligarchic conditions.
D
11:01Dorian WarrenGUEST
We have been here before, and it's instructive to look outside our borders at other countries in the world that are also under authoritarian or oligarchic governments and how people are resisting and envisioning something better.
D
11:16Dorian WarrenGUEST
It's also instructive to look at our own history, and especially in the American South, because there is no clearer place for me of where authoritarianism and oligarchy came together.
THE AGE OF THE OLIGARCHS
C
32:45Casey MichelGUEST
But there was one key difference which is worth highlighting for this podcast.
C
32:49Casey MichelGUEST
Um, there's a, um, a professor named Jeffrey Winters, uh, who's at Northwestern University.
C
32:54Casey MichelGUEST
He's one of the very few who has dedicated his career to kind of understanding oligarchy as a phenomenon.
C
32:59Casey MichelGUEST
And I t- I talked to him for the book, and he made the point that for, um, for thousands of years, that definition, that understanding, uh, did not make any distinction about where that money came from or how individuals made that money.