Skip to main content
James Tobin

James Tobin

American economistWikipedia

Search complete. 4 mentions across 4 episodes found for "James Tobin".

Sep 4, 2026

Dominique Dwor-FrecautGUEST
2:27
And at the time, it was found that you needed year-on-year growth of about 2% to lower unemployment by 1%.
Dominique Dwor-FrecautGUEST
2:39
I think James Tobin even had his own estimate of way back when, of the Okun coefficient was around two.
Dominique Dwor-FrecautGUEST
2:48
And so I, you know, did my own computation.
Dominique Dwor-FrecautGUEST
2:52
And to my surprise, I found the coefficient to be still two and stable post-pandemic.
Arthur LafferGUEST
49:43
It's an attempt at doing something that I don't think has worked historically.
Arthur LafferGUEST
49:47
Now, when James Tobin presented, the senior professor at Yale in economics, up at the White House there with Kennedy at the time, you know, he spoke with a gravitas.
Arthur LafferGUEST
49:56
It wasn't gimmicky.
Arthur LafferGUEST
49:57
Uh, it just didn't work.
Dan ArthHOST
49:27
Like Friedman, and for all their disagreements, Moynihan championed an income strategy of giving the poor financial assistance, Mr. Lenkowski says.
Dan ArthHOST
49:35
Pat fully subscribed to the view, as JFK economic advisor James Tobin once put it, that AFDC wasn't, wa- excuse me, was an insane piece of social engineering.
Dan ArthHOST
49:45
Moynihan wanted to look for ways to provide money that would not have the dependency-inducing effects th- that AFDC and food stamps had.
Dan ArthHOST
49:52
The risk? That the poor would spend cash foolishly, but being told how to spend it by a bureaucracy has its own ill effects on personal responsibility.
DanNARRATOR
49:27
Like Friedman, and for all their disagreements, Moynihan championed an income strategy of giving the poor financial assistance, Mr. Lankowski says.
DanNARRATOR
49:35
Pat fully subscribed to the view, as JFK economic advisor James Tobin once put it, that AFDC was an insane piece of social engineering.
DanNARRATOR
49:45
Moynihan wanted to look for ways to provide money that would not have the dependency-inducing effects that AFDC and food stamps had.
DanNARRATOR
49:52
The risk? That the poor would spend cash foolishly, but being told how to spend it by a bureaucracy has its own ill effects on personal responsibility.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.