Yes.

For me personally, I, I, I can't thank her enough for showing, showing that she was willing to fight literally to the last minute she was in the office, 'cause, um, there was, there was resistance from within the IC.

A- and again, there's the COVID Act of 2023.

I'm gonna use that as an example 'cause it's closest to me, and partly because I was the individual that sat in front of Senator Rand Paul's committee i- uh, on May 13th and discussed the COVID coverup and how Fauci's involvement What happened, we cannot heal as a nation from what occurred during COVID until those files are all released.

There are thousands and thousands of files, I, I, in my opinion, I think should be released to the public.

And, um, there's, there's, there's a balance there.

I'm, I'm using COVID as an example.

Right.

When you look at this cover-up and you think about someone like Dr. Fauci, who I can't believe is not behind bars at this point, how does someone like Fauci, who is not an intelligence officer, ends up influencing intelligence community assessments? I mean, who op- who do you believe opened the door for him to influence intelligence community assessments?

This started a long time ago.

This...

You know, the, the thing about, again, the thing about COVID, I, I think it's a symptom of much larger systemic issues, um, that started after 9/11.

Maybe, maybe even I'm too myopic in my viewpoints on that.

But after 9/11 and the anthrax attacks and when, um, former Vice President Dick Cheney, uh, helped facilitate the, the, the structural changes between biodefense and public health, once you start crossing those lines, and the huge buckets of money that are-- sit with public health and sit with biodefense, once those two buckets of money, uh, start getting intertwined and you've got the same scientists who may be involved in, uh Biodefense and public health cross-pollinating, um, y- you start a series of potential conflicts of interest that when you start layering it year after year in, in, um, in, in public, because it's public health, but also, uh, in secret, in s- within, behind the national defense, you know, curtain, because it's national defense secrets.

You create a situation that's very hard to provide oversight for, and there's, there's mechanisms for oversight.

Why, why shouldn't that be treated as, like, biological weapons work essentially?