That's just an overview of the back story.

Thanks for having me.

And just for people to understand the gravity of the position that she held, she was the senior medical officer within the largest institution on the planet known as the Department of Defense.

The largest.

And so in that position, if you read the roles, responsibilities, duties, mission, et cetera, as laid out by there's DOD instruction and Department of Defense directive.

That office, the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs, is responsible for mitigating health risks to the entire military force, active guard, reserves, civilians, contractors, everybody, right? That's affiliated, associated with the Department of Defense.

And so in that position, she's also responsible for

Let's spend the next, you know, the last segment here, actually talking about January 6th, your assessment briefly of what happened there and Michael Fanone.

But what are the questions that people have in their heads right now during our conversation that you might be able to answer for them as you talk about number two?

Yeah, before I get to number two, I think the biggest question that people ask about, okay, those that are really in tune and critical thinkers and have been following the COVID cartel for a while, they're thinking, "Oh, we voted for Donald Trump because Bobby Kennedy ran on going after the COVID cartel and having accountability for the un- you know, unlawful, unsafe, ineffective emergency u- use authorized products related to COVID." The jabs, right? The injections.

I would say this, so for those that are not observing any sort of accountability, you gotta keep in mind that Bobby Kennedy works at the pleasure of, uh, those that control the current hood ornament named Donald, Donald Trump, okay? Meaning Miriam, Suzy Wiles, Jared, uh, Bibi, et cetera.

So if Bobby Kennedy goes after the COVID cartel in an unlimited fashion based on how you would expect because after you read his book, The Real Anthony Fauci, and apply that sort of criminality to the rest of the COVID cartel and the, the companies like Pfizer, Moderna, et cetera, uh, within seconds he will no longer be the HHS secretary, okay? That's just...

That's an automatic.

That, that's, as a intel, former intel analyst, I would say with near certainty, the, like the highest level assessment you can create, this is beyond a, a, any reasonable doubt, literally.

Beyond almost any uncertainty, he would get fired.

Mm.

I love it

... with that, I mean, my origin story, uh, if I can, just to introduce the audience to my background and why, uh, I guess some people listen to what I have to say, is that, uh, you know, I spent 25 years in our national security ecosystem as a Green Beret intel officer, military diplomat, served, uh, countering ISIS, Taliban, MS-13, Russian aggression.

And when I had a...

Basically over the last 12 years, starting in 2014, uh, I had a front row seat to essentially the activities that then required an autopen scribble going back to 2014.

[laughs]

...

some people call Operation Fauci Speed.

Uh, I think that's a misnomer.

Okay, yeah, before we get to this first break, layout, what are the specifics of the defamation that you supposedly used against her?

Yeah, so the big picture on this lawsuit, real quick, is she sued the CIA for firing her.

She blames my statements publicly, caused a sequence of events where Laurel Loomer took those commentary into the White House in April of last year.

Then Donald Trump fires her along with the National Security Council staff and then tells John Radcliffe to fire her.

Well, none of that was true.

And the judge saw right through it.

So all the counts against CIA, the Radcliffe and myself were initially dismissed.

uh years later i've done the same test myself a year ago and and mine were not quite that high but significantly higher than they should be uh years after taking the vaccine years after any exposure to covid uh so i'm just wondering if you've got an aspect of this that will that will start looking at the data from a long-term effects perspective that may or may not be specifically associated with an immediate adverse react after getting the shot

And ultimately, I don't know if she sued you for, I don't want to say tortious interference.

Yeah, there was tortious interference.

So she sues the CIA, John Radcliffe, the director of the CIA.

For wrongful termination.

Right.

For different things, right? Due process, wrongful termination, just throwing everything.

And then she also sues, what is it? America's Future, which I was a board member of at the time, and then myself.

So we got the, okay.

Or you got her fired.

Her claim is that my comments on Roseanne Barr's podcast... were used by laura loomer okay and a i communicated somehow with laura loomer and laura loomer took that information and then presented it in her meeting with the president of the united states in april 4th or 5th of 2025 when she gave the dossiers of different individuals on the national security council national you know on who should be fired Then Donald Trump took that, President Trump took that information and then supposedly somehow then ordered the CIA director to then go ahead and fire Dr. Terry Adirum from her role at the CIA.

Here's where the problem lies for Dr. Terry Adirum.

I had not communicated, I have known Laurel Loomer for probably a decade, okay? Crossed paths on numerous occasions.

Up to that point, we didn't have any communication, probably for like a year up to that point.

I briefly saw her.

I was at an event in Arizona, and it was just really a hello that I saw her.

Accountability.

Oh, really? Is it one of those up and downs and flying through things or what?

Oh, it was like 415 miles.

We went from the Missouri River to the Mississippi River.

Hey, I'm trying to manifest, make America healthy again by doing it myself first.

And then riding with probably like 20 or 30,000 other riders.

It's the biggest bike ride across the entire world.

So next year, I invite you to be on the team.

Yeah,

made materially false

statements.

Wait, I think last time I checked, that is a violation of 18 USC section 1001, thus a criminal referral for his testimony from July 27th of 2021.

Unfortunately, this Department of Justice does not do anything.

It doesn't matter if it's a Biden illegitimate Department of Justice or a Trump Department of Justice.

And so they already let that statute of limitation lapse, just like they did with the materially false statements that Fauci made before Senator Rand Paul five years ago.

And so these crimes just continue to pile on and pile on with no accountability.

Hasn't he looked up what really happened and the fact that In 2005, Michael Byrd was suggested to be fired and terminated for all kinds of malfeasance.

The-

Well, I wouldn't say tried.

I just tried to physically hand it to him, and he didn't wanna accept it.

Eh, I get it.

Uh, and it's somewhat, you know, people say it's a spectacle.

Um, well, it's, the reason why I do it the way I do it is to create buzz and attention on a actual serious topic.

I get it, the way that I do it, you can call it clown world this and that.

Okay.

Is that normal?

Well, when I was there two days ago, that was about noon or 1:00 afternoon on Sunday, the FBI showed up within sec- seconds before me.

Um, and it was from the Violent Crimes Unit.

Now, Kash Patel stated that he had, was sending and deploying FBI assets that would be in the support role, and for those that aren't really tracking that, that jurisdiction is the Metropolitan Police Department has concurrent jurisdiction along with US Capitol Police, uh, because that's the extended jurisdiction zone of the US Capitol Police from a physical geography standpoint, and then also US Capitol Police has jurisdiction, uh, for the protection of members of Congress.

So I don't know if the call came in from US Capitol or MPD.

I doubt it.

Um, usually Kash Patel, based on the last year or so, he likes to inject himself, and so I don't know if it was more of a publicity stunt to show that he's doing something.

I think he does know.

You're known as having ice water in your veins.

Thanks for that description.

But what he claimed that I said, I've never said it publicly, privately, or even thought to say that about anybody's children.

So this is just totally outlandish.

It's clear defamation per se here in Virginia.

And I filed a lawsuit here.

I took a little bit of time.

This is a key chink in their armor, Ivan Reikland.

Ivan Reikland.

Yeah, so you just played the body cam footage and there was the analysis done by the Don and Donna.

And so one unique thing about the timing of all of this is that I got to give credit where credit's due with Tom Fitton and Judicial Watch.

They're the only litigation arm within the entire, I guess, American ecosystem that have been the adults in the room at pursuing the truth and eventually transparency and accountability related to January 6th.

They filed a lawsuit years ago that finally resulted in May of earlier this year, the release by the D.C.

Circuit Court of the actual body cam footage of Michael Fanone.

Whereas before we had access to it and Gary McBride, I got to give him props for being one of the J6 investigators that had identified and released the body cam footage.

You're not known as a-- You're known as having ice water in your veins.

[laughs] Thanks for that description.

But what he claimed that I said, I've never said it publicly, privately, or even thought to say that about anybody's children.

So this is just totally outlandish.

It's clear defamation per se here in Virginia, and I filed a lawsuit here.

Uh, you know, I took a little bit of time.

Uh, I was gonna drop it immediately, but then I got a deluge.

Ivan Raiklin.

You're known as having ice water in your veins.

Thanks for that description.

But what he claimed that I said, I've never said it publicly, privately, or even thought to say that about anybody's children.

So this is just totally outlandish.

It's clear defamation per se here in Virginia.

And I filed a lawsuit here.

I took a little bit of time.

Yeah,

I've never actually heard that before, but it's phenomenal.

No, exactly.

You nailed it.

So that's how I observe it.

Bigger picture, global picture.

So let's do a deep dive analysis.

I want to hit that really home, what you just talked about.

Hmm.

grab the bottle with the red cap next time you're at the store put it on just about anything then you'll understand cutie the original japanese mayonnaise

the state of israel now mind you she was born she just turned 80 on october 10th the day that donald trump got his booster shot maybe as a gift for her who knows so on october 10th of 2025 mariam adelson turns 80 years old She was born in Palestine, right? Because she predates the state of Israel.

When you start to dig at some of those relationships and you see where she plays in, she's kind of one of the founding members of influencing the development of the country of Israel, right? And then you start to dig further, You look at the Rothschild relationships, etc.

And then you hear recently that Jared Kushner is thankful to Tad Rothschild for giving him and Ivanka insight on this Albanian island that they're developing.

So a lot of this stuff is interrelated.

Mind you, that Bibi Netanyahu, when he would travel to New York for the UN UNGA, United Nations General Assembly meetings, right, every year, he would visit the Kushners, okay? Huh, what a coincidence, right? Anyhow, that's out there.

So without getting too messy on all the different names, you need to keep in mind and keep track as you look at the political decision-making, especially on foreign policy from this White House, you need to really track what Miriam Adelson's interests are.

Please continue.

I promise you, Democrats get back power, they will do just that.

Yeah, I think the way that we need to discuss accountability is if Senator Mark Wayne Mullen becomes the – I think on March 31st, if that first week of April he comes in essentially going like he did in that hearing you just played and not be stopped by Bernie Sanders.

I like to joke he was the one that stopped Senator Mullen from giving a little bit of, I guess, physical – confrontation with that Teamsters guy.

I think that Senator Mark, just for full disclosure before I go into this, I've known him for 10 years.

The first time I met him was when he came and visited.

I was deployed in the Middle East.

He actually visited myself and the guy that just ran for governor, Doc Pete Chambers in Texas, when we were both deployed to the Middle East for a week.

How hard is that going to be for him to get in there and start that process, Colonel? I think it's

What do you think's happening right now inside the Department of Justice?

Yeah, I just think that this is another instance where the deep state is undefeated against this president.

And so far, we've gotten zero wins.

When I say wins on the accountability front, I mean, you've seen that meme going around for the last year plus.

Number of arrests, Russia collusion hoax, zero.

Impeachment hoax one, zero.

Impeachment hoax two, zero.

What happens here, Colonel? What do we do? Do you think this is Todd Blanch? He's like the number two guy there.

What happened today? Where's your head at?

Yeah, so it was a status hearing and a detention determination hearing.

Essentially, we're at the moment where they're scheduling kind of future hearings.

What essentially transpired in the first administrative component of the hearing was that they're going to schedule something for February 27th at 10.30 a.m., which is a status hearing, in order to lay out how...

the potential trial is going to take place.

After that, I think the meat and potatoes of the hearing, which probably lasted another 45 minutes after that, was determining whether or not to continue to detain Brian Cole Jr.

So the defense team, which consists of five lawyers, interesting how he can afford that, but that's besides the point.

I guess to get to the heart of it, because we really only have about four or five minutes, Colonel, is this guy guilty? Do they have the right man? Did anything come out today that lead your suspicions about what's actually at play here?

Go ahead, uh, uh, Alex, play it.

[crowd murmuring] Hold on.

Hold on.

Nearby stop, please.

Mr. Smith, Ivan Raiklin.

How you been, sir? You're his attorney, right? Mr.

Smith, how you doing today? How about I challenge you to a debate any time in February, five hours on live TV, sir.

[laughing] They really believe-

What

is he doing there mumbling under his breath? No, he said the same thing.

First thing out of his mouth, I mean, apparently when you have Tourette's of the Fanon level, the first thing you say is not the acronym GFY, if you know what I mean.

And so he said that as a first response to when I put my hand out to shake his hand, man to man to say hello, he couldn't deal with that.

And then same thing when truth is put out by Congressman Troy Nels, he also becomes unhinged.

Officer Fanon should have been- should have been arrested, okay? This guy is a threat.

He's not a threat to me because in order to assault me, there has to be fear or apprehension of harm.

ear, if you will.

What happened?

I, I was just there, uh, attending to basically analyze what Jack Smith was going to do and speak about, and see how the Republicans were gonna treat him as a witness.

And then I saw immediately that the four key witnesses on what I call the January 6th Fed insurrection cover-up committee that Pelosi utilized, Fanone, Dunn, as referenced by Troy Nehls, were sitting present.

So during the break, I ended up sitting in the middle, where I normally sit, right, right behind the witness, in order to gain more attention on the actual hearing, 'cause most people don't have the stamina, wherewithal to, to watch a hearing, but sometimes when I'm there, it increases viewership, hopefully.

And I saw Mr. Fanone, and I put my hand out.

You saw the entire exchange.

I put my hand out, and I said, "Michael, Ivan Reichlin," and he immediately went into meltdown mode.

I've never seen that happen before.

What happened?

I was just there attending to basically analyze what Jack Smith was going to do and speak about and see how the Republicans were going to treat him as a witness.

And then I saw immediately that the four key witnesses on what I call the January 6th Fed Surrection Cover-Up Committee that Pelosi utilized, Fanone, Dunn, as referenced by Troy Nels, were sitting present.

So during the break, I ended up sitting in the middle where I normally sit, right behind the witness.

In order to gain more attention on the actual hearing, because most people don't have the stamina wherewithal to watch a hearing, but sometimes when I'm there, it increases viewership, hopefully.

And I saw Mr. Fanone, and I put my hand out.

You saw the entire exchange.

I've never seen that happen before.

Do you believe that FBI has been fully exposed and held accountable for any increased criminal acuity that they contributed to on that day?

So, that's a great question.

Most people focus in on the FBI.

I'm of the argument that based on the legal framework of the legislative branch and the Capitol, the jurisdiction th- itself, there is a statute called, you know, 2 U.S.C. 1967 (b) sub 1 lays out the jurisdiction of the US Capitol Police and they have primacy over the Capitol buildings and then by extension, the Capitol grounds along with MPD.

For the FBI to have a role in the fed insurrection, if you will, they had to have operated under the jurisdiction of the US Capitol Police.

Now, I'm not disagreeing with you that there were 274 out there, that, that's what Kash Patel put, released out there.

In, but in order to get to the totality of that fed insurrection, it starts with the legislative branch and downstream from that you had DHS potentially, MPD undercovers, FBI undercovers, CHSs and then affiliates.

What do we need to do to get to the bottom of January 6th, sir?

Do you see anyone being held to account as of yet? And where is this going to go?

First off, I want to thank Nick for doing the great work and investigative journalism.

But the problem is, the last 11 years, we've seen escalatory levels of treason that still has not been addressed.

I mean, no one's been held to account.

Going back to the Biden-Tribble syndicate brain of terror when they did 10% for big guy in 2014.

And then from there, we just saw the escalation of our destruction of the constitutional order.

I only see that what happened in Minnesota is just one level of fraud and deceit of the American taxpayer dollar and going back at a minimum of decades.

Could you tell us how that went, what went down, and what stood out to you?