Skip to main content
International Conference on Machine Learning

International Conference on Machine Learning

ConferenceWikipedia

Search complete. 24 mentions across 17 episodes found for "International Conference on Machine Learning".

Sep 11, 2026

Tim ScarfeHOST
26:25
Um, because a lot of people talk about knowledge being quite situated, and what they're meaning in that case is that it's only coherent if you, if you respect the constraints, and sometimes it's not possible to break the constraints.
Tim ScarfeHOST
26:36
And, um, another thing you spoke about, and this is also related to your 2024, um, ICML paper, which was, uh, open-endedness is, is, um, I, I think necessary or required for edge.
Edward HughesGUEST
26:46
Yes.
Tim ScarfeHOST
26:46
Yes.

33 MINS LATER

Edward HughesGUEST
59:59
Um, I hope that that will persist, in fact, because I think that will lead us to, um, different kinds of creativity from different kinds of constraints being broken.
Edward HughesGUEST
60:10
But then, of course, what you need if you're gonna have that kind of approach is you need a translation layer.
Edward HughesGUEST
60:15
Um, and so this is why, why when we talk about the, um, the definition of open-endedness in the paper that I wrote with Michael, um, uh, at ICML a couple of years ago, um, we talk about the idea of a, an open-ended system to an observer having to produce artifacts that are both novel and learnable.
Edward HughesGUEST
60:33
And it's really that learnable piece which is to this translation point.
Rohan AnilGUEST
13:41
And then I think that environment creates like great work.
Rohan AnilGUEST
13:45
And it was something about that like ethos and, um like farming that organism that can just like keep innovating is it's is this happened i think this has happened i would say back in the day in other labs right the bell labs and other places so it's like it's really hard to recreate and it does need like an all like a big industry like at least like back in the day there was uh multiple companies that had money to fund this and google definitely had the money to fund it and had the right people at the top to kind of think about the impact of these in an altruistic way in some sense, right? Because it was like publication, right? At some point, Google had like the most number of submissions for NeurIPS or ICML or in the top three.
Rohan AnilGUEST
14:30
So it was one of the biggest institutions, including Meta as well and other institutions
Allen RoushHOST
14:36
as well.
Yariv BarsheshatGUEST
3:06
We're trying to find sort of the most glaring issues that we can and that we can tackle with the resources we have.
Sarah KempHOST
3:13
I want to talk about ICML and what brought you to ICML.
Sarah KempHOST
3:18
So the paper, for someone who doesn't know, well, first of all, what's the title of the paper? And then the second question is, well, like, what is fine tuning for people who might not know?
Yariv BarsheshatGUEST
3:27
Sure.
John LangfordGUEST
40:35
And I think that's more generally true across algorithms for machine learning.
John LangfordGUEST
40:41
It could go back to NeurIPS from a decade ago or ICML a decade ago and, you know, or two decades ago.
John LangfordGUEST
40:50
There's lots of papers there which are, you know, oh, this is a better learning algorithm, doesn't get used, doesn't get adopted.
John LangfordGUEST
40:57
And why is that? Well, I think often you have weak baselines effectively.
Cal NewportHOST
14:18
Once we d- once we realize that's what this musing is, a couple major problems arise.
Cal NewportHOST
14:24
One, there's a growing body of research, including a brand-new paper at ICML this year and a well-known paper from NeurIPS from twenty twenty-three and many others as well as far as I know, that have, uh, established the fact that the reasoning that these reasoning models output can be performative, that it, that it can be unrelated to how it actually gener- how and why it generated the response it did.
Cal NewportHOST
14:49
And this makes sense because the way you tune a reasoning model to reason is you reward it for giving correct reasoning for questions.
Cal NewportHOST
14:57
They give it questions where they know the answer and, um, and they have examples of correct reasoning.
David HolzmüllerGUEST
53:18
Yeah, I mean, I would find it interesting also to look into better MLPs, like real MLP.
David HolzmüllerGUEST
53:26
Now there is also developments with TabPack at ICML to make faster MLPs and these kind of things.
David HolzmüllerGUEST
53:33
And I...
David HolzmüllerGUEST
53:35
I hope there will be also advancements with MLPs, at least for the large datasets.
Brian KeatingHOST
40:05
Again, it's kind of the key, the Einstein test of, you know, when these things can do stuff with a corpus that's lobotomized, you know, post 1905 or 1911, as the case may be.
Brian KeatingHOST
40:15
And it's a position paper in, uh, ICML, uh, 2026, which Roman probably knows what that means, uh, by Tom Zahavi, and it's called "Position: LLMs Can't Jump".
Brian KeatingHOST
40:27
And there's a famous movie called White Men Can't Jump with Woody Harrelson and Wesley Snipes, and it was about, you know, it was called...
Brian KeatingHOST
40:33
Basically, white men aren't good at basketball and, and, and it was kind of a funny comedy and, and drama, you know, coupled together.
Bryce Adelstein LelbachHOST
17:05
I don't know which ones are, like, necessarily the most popular.
Bryce Adelstein LelbachHOST
17:07
There's, like, the PyTorch conference, the, uh, MLSys, like, ICML, like, all the big AI conferences.
Bryce Adelstein LelbachHOST
17:13
Like, I think those ones are still, like, you know, super important and relevant to go to.
Bryce Adelstein LelbachHOST
17:17
And, like, you do also have to keep in mind that, like, the...
Paras ChopraGUEST
0:04
It's a different world now.
Paras ChopraGUEST
0:05
So if I don't know math, but I'm really good at a particular domain, why shouldn't I be allowed to participating in science? The contribution of Indian authors in ASTAR conferences like NeurIPS, ICML is, you know, less than 1%.
Paras ChopraGUEST
0:16
Statistically, you should expect India to have most number of geniuses.
Sreeram KannanHOST
0:23
We were talking about, you know, agents running companies.

26 MINS LATER

Paras ChopraGUEST
26:36
Yeah.
Paras ChopraGUEST
26:37
I think India needs to start at the very foundation and strengthen the culture of research.
Paras ChopraGUEST
26:44
So, I mean, I was part of my motivation starting LostFunk was realizing the contribution of Indian authors in A-star conferences like NeurIPS, ICML is, you know, less than 1%.
Paras ChopraGUEST
26:57
And I think China is 35%, US is 50%.
Stella BidermanGUEST
63:33
We recently put out a position paper called Don't Just Fix It In Post, Science of AI Must-Say Training Dynamics.
Stella BidermanGUEST
63:41
I gave an oral about this at ICML, and there was a related position paper um called there will be a science of ai by people with very similar ideas but kind of uh different levels of abstraction that they think about it they're thinking more about models as like mathematical objects um and have with mathematical properties and i'm more thinking about kind of the semantic properties you know memorization safety like like things that we describe using like everyday language to describe their behaviors um i think that like I think that these are both really important research agenda, and I really hope that more AI researchers will engage with it.
Ravid Shwartz-ZivHOST
64:17
Sounds important.
Ravid Shwartz-ZivHOST
64:19
Very important.

7 more episodes mention International Conference on Machine Learning.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.