Intentional infliction of emotional distress
8
MENTIONS
4
EPISODES
3
PODCASTS
Search complete. 8 mentions across 4 episodes found for "Intentional infliction of emotional distress".
Sep 29, 2026
speaker_1HOST
They are falsely imprisoned.
speaker_0HOST
Finally, we have the intentional infliction of emotional distress, or IIED.
speaker_0HOST
This requires extreme and outrageous conduct performed intentionally or recklessly, which causes the plaintiff to suffer severe emotional distress.
speaker_0HOST
The bar for outrageous is incredibly high.
speaker_2HOST
False imprisonment is the intentional confinement of a person to a bounded area with no reasonable means of escape, where the plaintiff is either aware of the confinement or harmed by it.
speaker_4HOST
Intentional infliction of emotional distress, or IIED, requires extreme and outrageous conduct that intentionally or recklessly causes severe emotional distress.
speaker_4HOST
Trespass to land is the intentional physical invasion of another's real property.
speaker_2HOST
Trespass to chattels and conversion both involve intentional interference with a plaintiff's personal property.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
April 28th, 2026, the civil suit is filed.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
Original counts, battery, fraud, intentional infliction of emotional distress, or IIED, which of course sounds fairly close to IED.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
Unauthorized likeness, no sexual battery count at that filing.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
The unauthorized likeness is about 15K worth of sponsorships she was supposed to have had.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
Alleged, accused, a rape.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
And June 2026, sexual battery added to civil suit.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
July 2026, clavicular side moves to dismiss fraud, the IIED, and unauthorized likeness.
Stefan MolyneuxHOST
They leave the injection battery count and ask to sever the sexual battery count to have that tried separately.
Bobby CapucciHOST
That is especially so when, as here, the plaintiff asserts a negligence claim.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Since almost all conduct that amounts to the intentional infliction of emotional distress also constitutes negligence, IIED claims are routinely dismissed for their redundancy with negligence claims.
Bobby CapucciHOST
CEG Wolkstein v. Morgenstern, 275 A.D., 2D-635-637, New York Appeals Division, 1st Apartment, 2000.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Generally, a cause of action for infliction of emotional distress is not allowed if essentially duplicative of tort or contract cause of action.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Samuel, et al.
Bobby CapucciHOST
v. Rockefeller University, 2022, WL 2916784, at 2, NY Supreme Court, July 25, 2022.
Bobby CapucciHOST
Dismissing IIED claims as duplicative of negligence claim.
Bobby CapucciHOST
So it is with the Jane Doe's IIED claims.