Instruction set architecture

可能 X86、X64 和 ARM 那么又要不同的 compiler。你，哪怕你写的 app 一模一样，那么但是因为它的架构不同，它那粒 U 的构造不同，那么所以呢，就要靠不同的编译器呢，去将这些人看得明白的东西呢，就适配回去，就是转变回去——

就是 CPU 的，就是简单来说 CPU 的 instruction set 啊。就是它，它，呃， CPU 有一堆的指令，就是你，你指令那支 CPU 做事，就是说，呃，走东、走西、走左、走右——

是啊。

呃，就是你加一、减一这样，你这些这样的指令呢，就是 CPU 只会看得明白一些很简单的指令而已。那么而，就是人写的东西呢，就会——

Yes.

I mean, RISC, RISC-V has been the, like, promised future of computing and the, like, the next ISA for information, uh-

Maybe, I, I'm not su- I'm not sure I would want to go on RISC-V because X86 chips from Intel are RISC Chips

Yeah, but they're not RISC-V, right?

Yeah.

And so that's-

I, I suppose my question, and feel free to say if you don't want to answer, but it's like producing an ISA has been like-

But we don't, we don't do that