Skip to main content
Institute for Justice

Institute for Justice

Nonprofit organizationwww.ij.org

Search complete. 137 mentions across 56 episodes found for "Institute for Justice".

Oct 29, 2026

Joe ConnorGUEST
1:07
Worked as a attorney litigating school choice cases across the country.
Joe ConnorGUEST
1:12
We represented, along with the Institute for Justice, a family out of Montana called the Espinoza family.
Joe ConnorGUEST
1:18
We also worked on helping repeal policies that prevented new private schools from opening, new homeschool associations from forming.
Joe ConnorGUEST
1:27
And so kind of everything that I've done in my 16 years in K through 12 has always been about, you know, how can we give parents more freedom, more choice, more autonomy when it comes to their children's education? And so it was kind of a natural step then after working in schools, starting schools, helping create and implement policy that I would move over and actually make sure that the software experience, the way that most parents deal with an ESA or a voucher or a tax credit is easy.
JohnAUDIENCE
5:37
But anyway, let's get back to the silver money.
Gary NolanHOST
5:40
Well, before we move on, let me just tell you, call the Goldwater Institute or the Institute for Justice and see if they'll take your case.
Gary NolanHOST
5:49
Because that seems like pretty steep fine.
Gary NolanHOST
5:53
Highway robbery.
Daniel McAdamsHOST
19:52
but the statistics on the technology's crime reduction results so far have been mixed.
Daniel McAdamsHOST
19:57
A recent working paper by researchers at University of South Carolina found that the license plate reader networks reduce motor theft, but the Arlington, Virginia-based Institute for Justice disputed the survey and questioned the interpretation of the findings, adding that disquiet about the technology appears to be more than a public is ready for.
Daniel McAdamsHOST
20:18
In a trade-off between surveillance and security, The alleged abuse of the technology by law enforcement officials has raised alarm bells even among voters who traditionally rate being tough on crime as a key election issue.
Daniel McAdamsHOST
20:33
Now here's a great quote.
Andy LarsenPANELIST
15:47
The Libertas Institute pitched a seven-bill series.
Andy LarsenPANELIST
15:52
The Institute for Justice proposed three different changes that basically would require warrants for this data to be accessed.
Andy LarsenPANELIST
16:01
set limits on how long the data would exist, whether it be deleted in 24 hours or seven days.
Andy LarsenPANELIST
16:08
Currently, the limit is nine months that this data can be accessed for.
John WrenchHOST
0:00
THE END Hello, and welcome to Unpublished Opinions, an Institute for Justice roundtable podcast.
John WrenchHOST
0:16
The podcast where IJ attorneys get together and give their unvarnished and unpublished opinions about the law.
John WrenchHOST
0:21
I'm your host, John Wrench, the Assistant Director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice.
John WrenchHOST
0:26
We're recording this on October 23rd, 2026.
John WrenchHOST
0:52
Earlier this week, there were quite a few denials of cert petitions at the U.S. Supreme Court, but there was one in particular, really a few, that caught our attention, and Patrick, I saw that you were recently posting on X about this.
John WrenchHOST
1:10
I'm wondering if you could kind of clue our listeners into what's going on in O'Donnell and some of the related cases.
Patrick JaicomoGUEST
1:16
Yeah, so to frequent IJ followers, you'll be aware that we've had a series of SWAT destruction takings claims.
Patrick JaicomoGUEST
1:25
And actually, over the years, we've filed now five different cert petitions on the issue of whether destruction by police is covered as a taking under the Fifth Amendment.
Steve LehtoHOST
0:23
And people are often shocked when they first hear about this, but this is a Things have been going on for quite some time.
Steve LehtoHOST
0:28
It's been getting a lot of publicity lately because of people like the Institute for Justice, but it's still happening.
Steve LehtoHOST
0:33
And so there's a really, really crazy example of this happening quite a bit in Indiana.
Steve LehtoHOST
0:41
And so Mickey tipped me off the story by Andrew Weimer.

9 MINS LATER

Steve LehtoHOST
10:02
Yeah, you can.
Steve LehtoHOST
10:03
Hire an attorney and go to court.
Steve LehtoHOST
10:05
And now the Institute for Justice is handling this case, and I believe they're handling it like their other cases, where they're taking it on because they like the principle of it, and it's not costing the litigants on their side to pursue this.
Steve LehtoHOST
10:19
And so right now, there are prosecutors and people, lawmakers in Indiana who are upset right now going, oh my gosh, this money flow that we're getting from the civilized forfeiture is being threatened.
John WrenchHOST
0:00
THE END Hello, and welcome to Unpublished Opinions, an Institute for Justice roundtable podcast.
John WrenchHOST
0:16
The podcast where IJ attorneys get together and give their unvarnished and unpublished opinions about the law.
John WrenchHOST
0:21
I'm your host, John Wrench, the Assistant Director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice.
John WrenchHOST
0:26
We're recording this on October 23rd, 2026.
John WrenchHOST
0:30
And I'm joined today by my colleagues Diana Simpson and Patrick Giacomo.
Don KissickGUEST
37:58
one of the few areas where I agree with Governor DeWine.
Don KissickGUEST
38:02
In recent years, especially with the work with the Institute for Justice, so many people have been exonerated from death row.
Don KissickGUEST
38:09
I'm not saying that they were completely innocent.
Don KissickGUEST
38:10
They may have been involved with other issues, other crimes, but we don't put them to death just because, well, they've got a bad history.
Anthony SandersHOST
0:11
Hello, and welcome to Short Circuit, your podcast on the Federal Courts of Appeals.
Anthony SandersHOST
0:15
I'm your host, Anthony Sanders, Director of the Center for Judicial Engagement at the Institute for Justice.
Anthony SandersHOST
0:21
We are recording this, that is what I'm saying right now, on Saturday, October 17th, 2026.
Anthony SandersHOST
0:28
But...

20 MINS LATER

Anthony SandersHOST
20:32
It's great to be here.
Anthony SandersHOST
20:33
Nice talking to you.
Anthony SandersHOST
20:35
So I am here with Julian Ellis, who is a Colorado attorney who is involved in all kinds of things that cross paths with what we do at the Institute for Justice.
Anthony SandersHOST
20:46
So Julian, tell us a bit about your practice and then your experience with the Tenth Circuit.
Jocelyn EstesGUEST
51:03
And the Army Corps of Engineers says there are 30-some villages in Alaska that are at risk for the kind of devastation that happened in these communities.
Jocelyn EstesGUEST
51:14
And Robin Bronin, who was with the Institute for Justice, and Ben Baldwin, who's Athabaskan, he's also with the Institute for Justice, have been trying to warn people and say, we need a regulatory and legal structure that allows us to address these disasters, these slow-moving disasters, before they happen.
Jocelyn EstesGUEST
51:42
And what Robin explained is that the legal infrastructure in the country is well prepared for disaster response.
Jocelyn EstesGUEST
51:52
but not for planning ahead and preventing a slow-moving disaster, the kind of thing that climate change is impacting communities with.

46 more episodes mention Institute for Justice.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.