HyperVerse

His argument appears to be that customers buy and use a legitimate product, while Shift chooses to return an unusually large proportion of its revenue to the people participating in its ecosystem.

All Ponzi schemes and scams that I've participated in, like Hyperverse, for example, 52% of Hyperverse's money went back to the people that promoted it.

All these schemes, anything to do with 50% rewards or 50% cashbacks, they all use the same mathematical formula.

But ordinary loyalty programs don't normally encourage customers to watch the leadership board and consumers purchase another $1,000 of unused loyalty points Because doing so might result in receiving $3,000 worth in cash.