
Hippolytus of Rome
HistorianWikipedia
133
MENTIONS
50
EPISODES
44
PODCASTS
Search complete. 133 mentions across 50 episodes found for "Hippolytus of Rome".
Sep 16, 2026
Trinitarians are Abandoning the Trinity!
S
55:48Swenson BaileyGUEST
He quotes John 17, and he quotes basically verbatim from the King Follett Discourse.
S
55:55Swenson BaileyGUEST
So if you remember in the King Follett Discourse, Joseph Smith says, hey, doesn't God say the apostles are one, just like he's one with the Father? So do they become one blob of something? Hippolytus of Rome in the third century says, hey, well, Christ says he's one with the Father, but he also says the disciples are one.
S
56:14Swenson BaileyGUEST
So are they one of body of substance? Of course not.
S
56:17Swenson BaileyGUEST
They're one of unity of mind.
D
56:22Devin BarnesGUEST
That sounds familiar.
C
56:25Cardon EllisHOST
Who is that?
S
56:25Swenson BaileyGUEST
Hippolytus of Rome? Hippolytus of Rome, yeah.
S
56:28Swenson BaileyGUEST
No,
Clement of Rome, Part VI - On the Journey with Matt, Ken, and Kenny, Episode 206
K
12:38Kenny BurchardHOST
Nobody's trying to differentiate or dislocate these books from one another as different kinds of scripture.
K
12:46Kenny BurchardHOST
Hippolytus in the year 204 writes, a verse-by-verse commentary on Susanna as part of the book of Daniel, which would be a strange thing to do on a book that's spurious or specious or not inspired or not scripture.
K
13:03Kenny BurchardHOST
Who cares? Why would you write a commentary on it? And yet, he does.
K
13:09Kenny BurchardHOST
Two more worth thinking about.
K
17:07Kenny BurchardHOST
If you find all the American Baptist pastors quoting the Deuterocanonicals when you survey their sermons and they all quote them like Scripture, the only conclusion you can draw if there's no caveat, if there's no disclaimer, is they think it's Scripture at least, whether they're right or wrong.
K
17:23Kenny BurchardHOST
And that's a great, great point.
M
17:24Matt SwaimHOST
Yeah, I just want to add something too because you've mentioned that Susanna in the Book of Daniel is mentioned by Irenaeus in 180 and Hippolytus in 204 and Origen in 240 that he's quoting – they're all quoting from the Book of Daniel and the story of Susanna.
M
17:42Matt SwaimHOST
And it may not be immediately apparent to some people that Susanna – While Daniel is in all the Protestant Bibles, the part about Susanna is not.
Praying to Saints: Defending the Protestant View
G
0:26Gavin OrtlundHOST
Number one: Is praying to saints directly taught in scripture? Number two: Is it a valid theological inference? Number three: Was praying to the righteous dead a practice in pre-Christian Judaism, sec- especially the Second Temple period? And number four: When does praying to saints emerge in church history? And I wanna defend my claim of it's not there for the first 200 years.
G
0:47Gavin OrtlundHOST
We'll look at the strongest counterargument from Hippolytus.
G
0:50Gavin OrtlundHOST
Before diving into those, let me address three unhelpful tactics reflected in some of the responses to my pre- previous video on this topic.
G
0:59Gavin OrtlundHOST
Number one: motive attribution.
18 MINS LATER
G
18:33Gavin OrtlundHOST
All you mortals, O Israel, priests of the Lord, servants of the Lord, and then here in verse eighty-six, spirits and souls of the just.
G
18:43Gavin OrtlundHOST
So do you see how reading this in context helps shed light on the nature of this address? What is not legitimate is to take one vocative of address in one way when it's the spirits and souls of the righteous, but taking the preceding twenty-five in a different way.
G
18:59Gavin OrtlundHOST
So these kinds of literary addresses to figures and animals and aspects of God's creation and snow and rain and so forth don't constitute a ground for asking for their intercession, and I'm gonna say more about Daniel three specifically from Hippolytus in a bit.
G
19:14Gavin OrtlundHOST
Poetic apostrophe, or if you don't like that term, hopefully you can at least understand the idea here.
Ancient Greek Philosopher-Scientists-Various
S
88:09speaker_13NARRATOR
If we may believe Heraclitus, the Ephesian, who says, Hogs wash themselves in mud, and doves in dust.
S
88:17speaker_13NARRATOR
Hippolytus.
S
88:18speaker_13NARRATOR
Refutation of all heresies.
S
88:21speaker_13NARRATOR
9.10. And good and evil are one.
1 HR 10 MINS LATER
G
158:24Graham RedmanNARRATOR
these say that the first principle is water and they are led to this result by things that appear to sense for warmth lives in moisture and dead things wither up and all germs are moist and all nutriment is moist now it is natural that things should be nourished by that from which each has come and water is the first principle of moist nature accordingly they assume that water is the first principle of all things and they assert that the earth rests on water Thales is the first to have set on foot the investigation of nature by the Greeks, although so many others preceded him, in Theophrastus' opinion he so far surpassed them as to cause them to be forgotten.
G
159:16Graham RedmanNARRATOR
It is said that he left nothing in writing except a book entitled Nautical Astronomy.
G
159:24Graham RedmanNARRATOR
Hippolytus, Philosophumina I.
G
159:28Graham RedmanNARRATOR
It is said that Thales of Miletus, one of the seven wise men, was the first to undertake the study of physical philosophy.
292. Is Jesus Coming Back Soon? War, Chaos and the Hope of His Return
C
12:14Cris RogersHOST
So some of these you, you might be aware of, some of others you, you may not.
C
12:20Cris RogersHOST
You know, for example, I'm gonna butcher these names, Hippolytus of Rome, it was roughly around 200 AD.
C
12:28Cris RogersHOST
Hippolytus, he predicted, uh, that biblical chron- chronology basically left us to believe that Jesus would return some point around AD 50, and his calculations were clearly wrong.
C
12:42Cris RogersHOST
Uh, I'm gonna say Joachim of, uh, Fiore in the 12th century.
Why You Should Choose Anglicans Instead of Catholic #336
A
19:20Austin WhiteGUEST
Yeah.
A
19:21Austin WhiteGUEST
I believe it's St. Hippolytus who basically says that the gospel reached the English Isles as early as AD in the 40s, up to the 80s.
A
19:33Austin WhiteGUEST
But first century, for sure, the gospel was in the English Isles.
A
19:37Austin WhiteGUEST
We know that.
66. Daniel 12: Not About Resurrection? (Dr. John Walton)
J
23:38John WaltonGUEST
And the earliest we could find was 500 years removed from the latest possible composition of the book.
J
23:45John WaltonGUEST
That is Hippolytus, second, third century AD is the first one we could find.
J
23:51John WaltonGUEST
Plenty of people know Daniel, plenty of people know resurrection, but they don't pull them together until half a millennium after the time of Daniel.
J
24:01John WaltonGUEST
So we thought that was intriguing as well.
The Christians Who Thought God Was Evil | Taylor Caron on the Gnostic Gospels
T
41:39Taylor CaronGUEST
The next interesting page here by Bentley Layton has.
T
41:43Taylor CaronGUEST
an exegesis of that one fragment by a church father, Hippolytus, second century church father, who's against Valentinus.
T
41:50Taylor CaronGUEST
And his claim is that all of this stuff that Valentinus is doing, which is kind of like vague and poetic, is actually just coded Sethianism.
T
41:59Taylor CaronGUEST
that it's meant to be understood by real Sethians what the meaning is and to kind of trick regular Christians to not notice that this might be heretical.
Heaven Isn’t Your Final Destination | What the New Testament Actually Says
B
24:03BenGUEST
uh tertullian ad 155 to 220 in a treaties on the soul 55 every soul is determined i'm sorry every soul is detained in a safekeeping in hades until the day of the lord and in chapter 58 he says all souls therefore are shut up within hades uh kind of crazy tertullian if you still think they're in freaking hades but the point here being Many church fathers, which we reference today as authorities for other positions, did not believe we go into heaven upon death.
B
24:40BenGUEST
And the last one, Hippolytus of Rome, A.D. 170 to 235, against Plato on the cause of the universe.
B
24:49BenGUEST
But now we must speak of Hades, in which all souls, both of the righteous and the unrighteous, are detained.
B
24:57BenGUEST
And then later he says, Hades, in which the souls of all the detained until the time of which God has determined.
#12887 What Do Protestants Get Wrong About Jerome and the Canon? - Stephen Boyce
S
24:50Stephen BoyceGUEST
Origen Against Celsus, by the way, says that they only used the Torah.
S
24:54Stephen BoyceGUEST
Hippolytus of Rome, which is second century into the third century, says they did not use the prophets or the sages.
S
25:01Stephen BoyceGUEST
They only used the Law of Moses.
S
25:03Stephen BoyceGUEST
Jerome, in his commentary, Matthew 22, actually argues that exact same point, that the Sadducees only accepted the Mosaic books, and that's why Jesus used the Mosaic books against them in dealing with the subject of the resurrection, as opposed to the prophets.
6 MINS LATER
S
31:08Stephen BoyceGUEST
You mentioned scholars that think the Sadducees did.
S
31:12Stephen BoyceGUEST
There's some scholars that leave it in question, but there's only three statements in antiquity, 'cause Josephus kind of leaves it unknown, um, particularly, but...
S
31:21Stephen BoyceGUEST
So do you think when Origen was talking to Celsus, for example, and he said that the, the Samaritans and the Sadducees received Moses's books alone, and Hippolytus says the same thing, and Jerome, are you saying that they're incorrect, they're working off of faulty information? Or are you saying that there's other counterarguments in history that point to the opposite?
M
31:42MarkAUDIENCE
The, the S- the, the Samaritans are a whole other thing.
40 more episodes mention Hippolytus of Rome.
Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.