Skip to main content
Hippolytus of Rome

Hippolytus of Rome

HistorianWikipedia

Search complete. 133 mentions across 50 episodes found for "Hippolytus of Rome".

Sep 16, 2026

Swenson BaileyGUEST
55:48
He quotes John 17, and he quotes basically verbatim from the King Follett Discourse.
Swenson BaileyGUEST
55:55
So if you remember in the King Follett Discourse, Joseph Smith says, hey, doesn't God say the apostles are one, just like he's one with the Father? So do they become one blob of something? Hippolytus of Rome in the third century says, hey, well, Christ says he's one with the Father, but he also says the disciples are one.
Swenson BaileyGUEST
56:14
So are they one of body of substance? Of course not.
Swenson BaileyGUEST
56:17
They're one of unity of mind.
Devin BarnesGUEST
56:22
That sounds familiar.
Cardon EllisHOST
56:25
Who is that?
Swenson BaileyGUEST
56:25
Hippolytus of Rome? Hippolytus of Rome, yeah.
Swenson BaileyGUEST
56:28
No,
Kenny BurchardHOST
12:38
Nobody's trying to differentiate or dislocate these books from one another as different kinds of scripture.
Kenny BurchardHOST
12:46
Hippolytus in the year 204 writes, a verse-by-verse commentary on Susanna as part of the book of Daniel, which would be a strange thing to do on a book that's spurious or specious or not inspired or not scripture.
Kenny BurchardHOST
13:03
Who cares? Why would you write a commentary on it? And yet, he does.
Kenny BurchardHOST
13:09
Two more worth thinking about.
Kenny BurchardHOST
17:07
If you find all the American Baptist pastors quoting the Deuterocanonicals when you survey their sermons and they all quote them like Scripture, the only conclusion you can draw if there's no caveat, if there's no disclaimer, is they think it's Scripture at least, whether they're right or wrong.
Kenny BurchardHOST
17:23
And that's a great, great point.
Matt SwaimHOST
17:24
Yeah, I just want to add something too because you've mentioned that Susanna in the Book of Daniel is mentioned by Irenaeus in 180 and Hippolytus in 204 and Origen in 240 that he's quoting – they're all quoting from the Book of Daniel and the story of Susanna.
Matt SwaimHOST
17:42
And it may not be immediately apparent to some people that Susanna – While Daniel is in all the Protestant Bibles, the part about Susanna is not.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
0:26
Number one: Is praying to saints directly taught in scripture? Number two: Is it a valid theological inference? Number three: Was praying to the righteous dead a practice in pre-Christian Judaism, sec- especially the Second Temple period? And number four: When does praying to saints emerge in church history? And I wanna defend my claim of it's not there for the first 200 years.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
0:47
We'll look at the strongest counterargument from Hippolytus.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
0:50
Before diving into those, let me address three unhelpful tactics reflected in some of the responses to my pre- previous video on this topic.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
0:59
Number one: motive attribution.

18 MINS LATER

Gavin OrtlundHOST
18:33
All you mortals, O Israel, priests of the Lord, servants of the Lord, and then here in verse eighty-six, spirits and souls of the just.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
18:43
So do you see how reading this in context helps shed light on the nature of this address? What is not legitimate is to take one vocative of address in one way when it's the spirits and souls of the righteous, but taking the preceding twenty-five in a different way.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
18:59
So these kinds of literary addresses to figures and animals and aspects of God's creation and snow and rain and so forth don't constitute a ground for asking for their intercession, and I'm gonna say more about Daniel three specifically from Hippolytus in a bit.
Gavin OrtlundHOST
19:14
Poetic apostrophe, or if you don't like that term, hopefully you can at least understand the idea here.
speaker_13NARRATOR
88:09
If we may believe Heraclitus, the Ephesian, who says, Hogs wash themselves in mud, and doves in dust.
speaker_13NARRATOR
88:17
Hippolytus.
speaker_13NARRATOR
88:18
Refutation of all heresies.
speaker_13NARRATOR
88:21
9.10. And good and evil are one.

1 HR 10 MINS LATER

Graham RedmanNARRATOR
158:24
these say that the first principle is water and they are led to this result by things that appear to sense for warmth lives in moisture and dead things wither up and all germs are moist and all nutriment is moist now it is natural that things should be nourished by that from which each has come and water is the first principle of moist nature accordingly they assume that water is the first principle of all things and they assert that the earth rests on water Thales is the first to have set on foot the investigation of nature by the Greeks, although so many others preceded him, in Theophrastus' opinion he so far surpassed them as to cause them to be forgotten.
Graham RedmanNARRATOR
159:16
It is said that he left nothing in writing except a book entitled Nautical Astronomy.
Graham RedmanNARRATOR
159:24
Hippolytus, Philosophumina I.
Graham RedmanNARRATOR
159:28
It is said that Thales of Miletus, one of the seven wise men, was the first to undertake the study of physical philosophy.
Cris RogersHOST
12:14
So some of these you, you might be aware of, some of others you, you may not.
Cris RogersHOST
12:20
You know, for example, I'm gonna butcher these names, Hippolytus of Rome, it was roughly around 200 AD.
Cris RogersHOST
12:28
Hippolytus, he predicted, uh, that biblical chron- chronology basically left us to believe that Jesus would return some point around AD 50, and his calculations were clearly wrong.
Cris RogersHOST
12:42
Uh, I'm gonna say Joachim of, uh, Fiore in the 12th century.
Austin WhiteGUEST
19:20
Yeah.
Austin WhiteGUEST
19:21
I believe it's St. Hippolytus who basically says that the gospel reached the English Isles as early as AD in the 40s, up to the 80s.
Austin WhiteGUEST
19:33
But first century, for sure, the gospel was in the English Isles.
Austin WhiteGUEST
19:37
We know that.
John WaltonGUEST
23:38
And the earliest we could find was 500 years removed from the latest possible composition of the book.
John WaltonGUEST
23:45
That is Hippolytus, second, third century AD is the first one we could find.
John WaltonGUEST
23:51
Plenty of people know Daniel, plenty of people know resurrection, but they don't pull them together until half a millennium after the time of Daniel.
John WaltonGUEST
24:01
So we thought that was intriguing as well.
Taylor CaronGUEST
41:39
The next interesting page here by Bentley Layton has.
Taylor CaronGUEST
41:43
an exegesis of that one fragment by a church father, Hippolytus, second century church father, who's against Valentinus.
Taylor CaronGUEST
41:50
And his claim is that all of this stuff that Valentinus is doing, which is kind of like vague and poetic, is actually just coded Sethianism.
Taylor CaronGUEST
41:59
that it's meant to be understood by real Sethians what the meaning is and to kind of trick regular Christians to not notice that this might be heretical.
BenGUEST
24:03
uh tertullian ad 155 to 220 in a treaties on the soul 55 every soul is determined i'm sorry every soul is detained in a safekeeping in hades until the day of the lord and in chapter 58 he says all souls therefore are shut up within hades uh kind of crazy tertullian if you still think they're in freaking hades but the point here being Many church fathers, which we reference today as authorities for other positions, did not believe we go into heaven upon death.
BenGUEST
24:40
And the last one, Hippolytus of Rome, A.D. 170 to 235, against Plato on the cause of the universe.
BenGUEST
24:49
But now we must speak of Hades, in which all souls, both of the righteous and the unrighteous, are detained.
BenGUEST
24:57
And then later he says, Hades, in which the souls of all the detained until the time of which God has determined.
Stephen BoyceGUEST
24:50
Origen Against Celsus, by the way, says that they only used the Torah.
Stephen BoyceGUEST
24:54
Hippolytus of Rome, which is second century into the third century, says they did not use the prophets or the sages.
Stephen BoyceGUEST
25:01
They only used the Law of Moses.
Stephen BoyceGUEST
25:03
Jerome, in his commentary, Matthew 22, actually argues that exact same point, that the Sadducees only accepted the Mosaic books, and that's why Jesus used the Mosaic books against them in dealing with the subject of the resurrection, as opposed to the prophets.

6 MINS LATER

Stephen BoyceGUEST
31:08
You mentioned scholars that think the Sadducees did.
Stephen BoyceGUEST
31:12
There's some scholars that leave it in question, but there's only three statements in antiquity, 'cause Josephus kind of leaves it unknown, um, particularly, but...
Stephen BoyceGUEST
31:21
So do you think when Origen was talking to Celsus, for example, and he said that the, the Samaritans and the Sadducees received Moses's books alone, and Hippolytus says the same thing, and Jerome, are you saying that they're incorrect, they're working off of faulty information? Or are you saying that there's other counterarguments in history that point to the opposite?
MarkAUDIENCE
31:42
The, the S- the, the Samaritans are a whole other thing.

40 more episodes mention Hippolytus of Rome.

Create an account to see the whole feed, search across every transcript, and follow the entities you care about.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.