high dynamic range

The new 8.5 inch Super Retina XDR display not only moves to OLED, which means inkier blacks, but it's also twice as bright as before.

In contrast, its predecessor topped out at 600 nits, The new iPad mini peaks at 1200 nits, promising better outdoor performance and improved HDR content.

The new screen also has a one-nit minimum brightness.

On the 256 and 512 gigabyte models, users can also upgrade to a nano texture display to reduce glare and reflections.

I will sit there and I will tweak settings.

I will tweak like HDR and like, you know, like calibrate.

And even then, I'm getting a little bit tired of that.

I'm like, why doesn't this just work? It is crazy that HDR still does not...

HDR is just broken across so many different games.

Like

HDR in

general? In general.

It is.

It also supports HDR, high dynamic range, same as on your TV, and wide color gamut images.

Supports animation, layers, thumbnails, and progressive loading.

So over top of the picture, you could put a dancing cat, for example.

on Kaleidoscape, I

have 4k, HDR 10, no Dolby vision and no Dolby Atmos.

It has DTS master audio 5.1.

Sorry.

You know, it all looks lush and green and all the detail of the rock and the water and the leaves and the detail on the trees as you sort of walk in.

very

title sequence of him driving right right at the beginning the title secret that is it's beautiful i had the we had the 4k or i had the 4k hdr uh hdr 10 and it it was same thing it was gorgeous so well done a lot of dark scenes obviously that were so well done um it it It wasn't one that I would be like, oh, wow, what an amazing HDR experience.

What an amazing.

AVIF supports progressive rendering.

For HDR, which is high dynamic range, JPEG XL lacks gain maps, which is a significant limitation compared to AVIF.

jpeg xl can make existing jpegs 9 to 20 percent smaller without further loss so that's a good takeaway also you can just use it and then for lossless okay for lossless jpeg xl is the clear winner lossless webp is 9 to 17 percent larger for photos and lossless avif is 30 to 120 percent larger but lossless images are almost never what you want on the web if you do use them on the web like i do on this page watch out for jixel's higher efforts it often produces files that are too slow to decode and animated image formats continue to be a dumb idea please don't use them so like jake's takeaway here i think is important it's basically for web use cases i default to avif is what he says and then if you need to do in a large lossless file then you could take a look at jpeg excel and Um, or I guess if you have existing JPEG images and you're just looking for a quick win, you could convert them to JPEG Excel.

But at that point, I feel like you might as well use AVIF, right?

When Half-Life 2 introduced Bloom into the game and you'd walk through a door and things were brighter outside.

This was before HDR really took off in a big way.

Some of the initial reactions, and I've heard this since about HDR, is I actually don't want to have a flashbang blind me.

I don't want to have the sun blind me when I walk out the door.

I like to have the video game-like superpower of not being blinded by the sun when I go out and things.