Hefker

No, so how come we didn't say that? The second tazov teaches me the following, that if you're mafgir, you're vineyard, and then the next day you come and you harvest the vineyard and you take it for yourself before anyone has a chance to take from it.

It's not like other hefker, which is potter from matnasaniyim.

You just pot from Maisos on account of the fact that it was Hefker.

Meaning you pulled a shtick.

Hefker is potting from all these Matanos.

So you say at 2 o'clock in the morning, you say Hefker, right? And then the next morning you're there at 5 a.m.

and you harvest everything before anyone can get there.

So it's tako pot from Maisos, so it works on that level, but you still chayivim perolos in Shechem Peah based on the extra ta'azot.

And then the next morning he goes to harvest his grapes and he takes them for himself before anyone else has a chance to take anything from it.

It's not like Hefker, which is potter from Mount Nesaniyim.

Potter from the Masons.

He's chayiv in all the matnasaniyim, he's just pata from maestros.

from any type of tithing or any type of obligations they have to the poor.

So what do I do? I make it Hefker.

I make it Hefker.

Obviously, an ownerless field is not subject to any of these halachas.

So I make it Hefker.

So what do I do? I make my field Hefker.

And the next morning, hey, it's Hefker.

I go and I harvest it myself.

In the morning he goes and he cuts the grapes before anybody should get that.

Is that considered as if he got it from Hefker? And since he got it from Hefker, he's not going to be chayiv and matnas and niyam.

So we see that Hefker Under certain circumstances, you will be chai v'mat nesaniyim.

There was a bag full of money that came to the yeshiva.

Rav Ami went and took ownership of the entire bag.

But potter min ha-maises, you would be potter, because it doesn't say the extra tazeh.

So it's specifically halacha in the mat nesaniyim, not maizeroni, but at least the lech ha-chechape, et cetera, that if you take it back from Hefker, you're going to be chai.

You could take it from somebody else, you won't be chai.

If you take it from Hefker, your own, you would be chai.

Who shackled the denouement? Similar case, we had someone, a rich guy, comes to the Mesa Medesh, and he puts down a pile of money on the table, and he says, this is for the yeshiva.

So, who takes the money? That is Haredi politics.

That's the Ozei Tazei.

He's a Rebui that even if you were a Mafker and you took it from Hefker, you're still going to be chayiv in matnas.

There was a sack of money that was in the Beis Medesh.

And Qadar Rav Ami, he was the first one.

Because it's Aser Barna, you can't technically own it, but as far as being a violation of the Halacha, so those are special circumstances that the Torah considers it as if it's his.

so therefore to prevent that negative effect just expressing that you don't want is adequate so it's not a formal Hefker in the regular sense it's preventing the Torah's giving him possession against his will.

They say that you cannot do Bitzel with a shelech, but in a tight spot, you can be make-up, because most agree to this psalm.

However, again, this all assumes that the shlichas was made, that you appointed someone to perform this on your behalf, without shlichas, so then it will not work.