Hardgainer

... it's just not really applicable to anyone that's actually trying to really build a impressive physique.

I, I was a huge fan, and I still got a lot of the magazines from Hardgainer Magazine, and I've even got books where the Hardgainers talk about their style of training, and they'll, as often as not, they'll, they'll preface the very introduction to the hardest workout they've ever had with, "I weigh 168 pounds," and you think, "Motherfucker, you're not eating." But science-based guys, they would, they show you these cuffed this exercise, and ankle cuff that exercise, or whatever else, and you go, "Bitch, you're just nitch- literally not putting enough food on your fucking plate to grow because you look the same as you have for the last 12 months, 18 months, 2 years." So, and as you said, the classic example with the science stuff, and Steve and I have done, uh, study research for the GLP shows, for example, is using untrained individuals at university that are getting paid, even if it's only $30, to take part in a study versus people like you, me, and Steve that have been training for a decent length of time, and then seeing changes to our physiques because of the science that's being given.

So if nothing else, listeners, and Sam makes a great point here, look at the why versus the, the, the, the topic title or whatever else.

And if nothing else, that, a good, that's just a great example.

Then I eventually had my own column.

I wrote the Hardgainer column for 10 years there.

Um, there was another part of the story that I forgot that I was gonna bring up.

But anyway, that was kind of like the beginning.