Root, Inc.

Now, where does this sit within the context of our generative AI case law that we've been discussing for this entire year? If you've been following our generative AI series, every decision so far has asked one question.

When a party uses AI in connection with litigation, is that use protected? Warner versus Gilbarco and Morgan versus V2X, which we discussed both of at Relativity Fest, held that a party's own AI can be work product under Rule 26B3.

United States versus Hefner in a criminal context found no protection when a client used AI outside of the relationship with counsel.

and tate group automotive versus legacy automotive protected an executive's chat gpt conversations but ordered the party to identify what it fed into the tool remember though that tate was under a different rule in texas than the federal rules of civil procedure if you want to go back to the details on any of those we'll include the episodes in the show notes for you Now Conlon asks a different question.