Skip to main content
Generally recognized as safe

Generally recognized as safe

Search complete. 44 mentions across 9 episodes found for "Generally recognized as safe".

Aug 30, 2026

Neil SaavedraHOST
13:33
And that is what some refer to as This regulatory gap that's often referred to as a GRAS loophole, G-R-A-S loophole.
Neil SaavedraHOST
13:44
What does that stand for? Well, that stands for Generally Recognized as Safe.
Neil SaavedraHOST
13:51
So as we know, the vast majority of things that become toxic become toxic either inherently they're toxic or they're toxic in a particular dose.
Neil SaavedraHOST
14:03
So toxicity, doctors will tell you toxicity is in the dose.
Neil SaavedraHOST
14:54
And the woman died from... just too much water, which is not an easy thing to do, I imagine.
Neil SaavedraHOST
15:02
So toxicity is always going to be in the dose.
Neil SaavedraHOST
15:04
But what we're looking at as these generally recognized as safe, this kind of regulatory gap is tightening that up and finding out what's in there.
Neil SaavedraHOST
15:12
And I think these sweeteners are going to end up being some of the first things.
Adrienne BloomHOST
3:06
Um, but okay, so I'm just gonna get right into the news that we have for you today.
Adrienne BloomHOST
3:11
So first up in news, FDA has proposed a significant change to the generally recognized as safe, or GRAS, framework that would require companies to notify the agency when they independently conclude that a substance used in human or animal food is GRAS.
Adrienne BloomHOST
3:29
So the new proposed rule would amend 21 CFR Parts 170 and 570 and largely end the existing voluntary notification system.
Adrienne BloomHOST
3:40
It would apply to substances that are introduced into interstate commerce under the GRAS provision of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, including ingredients added directly to food and substances added indirectly, such as those that migrate from food packaging.
Adrienne BloomHOST
3:56
So of note, mandatory notification would not turn GRAS into a pre-market review and approval program.
Adrienne BloomHOST
4:03
Companies would still independently determine whether a substance is GRAS, and then market it before notifying FDA or while FDA evaluates the notice.
Adrienne BloomHOST
4:14
So instead, FDA said mandatory notification would improve post-market oversight by giving the agency greater visibility into substances entering the food supply and helping it identify uses that may actually require food additive approval.
Adrienne BloomHOST
4:29
So under the current system, FDA says it doesn't know how many substances are marketed based solely on independent GRAS conclusions.
Graham MorganHOST
2:36
That's an NPRM.
Graham MorganHOST
2:38
And this one has been championed by RFK Jr., and it's aimed at eliminating this massive loophole in the food supply known as self-GRAS.
Graham MorganHOST
2:47
For anyone not steeped in the acronyms, GRAS stands for Generally Recognized as Safe.
Dana MahoneyHOST
2:52
Right.
Dana MahoneyHOST
2:53
And, you know, whenever a federal agency, in this case, Health and Human Services or HHS, proposes a massive rule change that reshapes an industry, they have to present an economic impact analysis.
Dana MahoneyHOST
7:36
It comes down to the true cost of what the FDA calls mandatory notification.
Dana MahoneyHOST
7:41
The FDA's entire baseline is built on this massive load-bearing assumption.
Dana MahoneyHOST
7:46
They estimate it will take a company exactly 180 hours of administrative work to prepare and submit a GRAS notice.
Eric BergGUEST
43:17
It's been going on since 1958.
Eric BergGUEST
43:20
It stands for Generally Recognized as Safe.
Eric BergGUEST
43:25
So this was initially created just for household ingredients like salt and vinegar.
Eric BergGUEST
43:32
Of course, over time, corporate capture came in and the system changed completely.
Marion NestleGUEST
1:08
People weren't dying on the spot.
Marion NestleGUEST
1:11
So by the late 1950s, they determined that the additives that had been around for a long time, um, were generally recognized as safe or GRAS, G-R-A-S, GRAS.
Marion NestleGUEST
1:26
And they were out in the food supply, and the idea was if anybody could find anything wrong with them, they would take them out.
Marion NestleGUEST
1:33
Otherwise, they were in.

6 MINS LATER

Marion NestleGUEST
7:07
Yeah
Jonathan WolfHOST
7:07
... could you help me to understand that?
Marion NestleGUEST
7:08
What the FDA is able to do is to revoke the GRAS status, and it did that for trans fats.
Marion NestleGUEST
7:15
That is partially hydrogenated, uh, salad oils that have fatty acids in a specific configuration that's different from the natural one, and they revoked.
Wendy BellHOST
3:38
They haven't, and it's crazy, that these people are, like, imposters.
Wendy BellHOST
3:44
Major news for all Americans, the FDA is finally announcing what they call GRAS reform, G-R-A-S. That's that acronym for Generally Recognized as Safe.
Wendy BellHOST
4:00
Right? It's not been tested to be safe.
Wendy BellHOST
4:01
It's not proven to be safe, but we kind of feel...
Wendy BellHOST
4:06
It's generally we feel kind of safe.
Wendy BellHOST
4:09
That's GRAS.
Wendy BellHOST
4:10
You guys feel good about GRAS, Generally Recognized as Safe? No.
Wendy BellHOST
4:14
And Democrats and Republicans have agreed for decades that it's garbage.
Michelle VisserHOST
0:22
So you might be surprised at my thoughts on this.
Michelle VisserHOST
0:26
I'm breaking down today what it is to be a generally recognized as safe ingredient, what it means and what the new proposal coming from the FDA, what it could change and why I'm not convinced that government regulation is really the answer here.
Michelle VisserHOST
0:47
Stay with me until the end because I'm going to share what I believe is actually the most powerful thing you and I can do to truly change the broken food system.
Michelle VisserHOST
0:59
And it's something that you can start doing today right in your own pantry.
Michelle VisserHOST
3:12
Okay, so my head is spinning with so many things that I want to cover in this episode.
Michelle VisserHOST
3:18
So first, I want to start by backtracking.
Michelle VisserHOST
3:21
Before we get too far into this episode, we've actually talked about the history behind ingredients being considered generally recognized as safe.
Michelle VisserHOST
3:34
We did a full episode quite a while back, episode 131.
Brandy RashidianHOST
36:31
That's good stuff.
Amir RashidianHOST
36:32
Do you know they have this thing? It's called Generally Recognized as Safe or GRAS.
Brandy RashidianHOST
36:36
Yeah, it's ridiculous.
Amir RashidianHOST
36:38
Under the present Generally Recognized as Safe or GRAS system, a manufacturer can determine that a new ingredient is safe And introduce it into food without necessarily notifying the FDA.
Amir RashidianHOST
36:50
So they can put whatever the heck they want in there
Brandy RashidianHOST
36:52
And for the record, if you and I read the, the, the ingredients listed under GRAS, we would not feel the same way.
Patrick KellyHOST
5:18
More than 200,000 professionals across academia, industry, and government, all working towards food systems that are safe, nutritious, sustainable, and accessible.
Patrick KellyHOST
5:29
So Dr. Niemira today is gonna talk a little about GRAS, G-R-A-S, uh, generally recognized as safe, and UPF, ultra-processed foods, and that push for a standardized definition.
Patrick KellyHOST
5:43
And these conversations, uh, are gonna impact product development, innovation, regulatory timelines, and ultimately, what consumers understand about the food they buy.
Patrick KellyHOST
5:52
That's right, even you and me.

We value your privacy

We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.