Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act

Actions have consequences and inaction has consequences too.

We've sued violent protesters under the FACE Act for intimidating Jewish Americans worshiping at synagogues.

So she's using the FACE.

She's admitting, okay, here we are.

Palestinians are so bad and so savage that they can't even be imported when they are like, let's say when other countries, Muslim countries agree to take them in.

they realized real quick they made a really really big mistake meaning the savage muslim countries that take them in realize these muslims are of a whole different ilk they're a whole different level of inbred savagery and they send them back that's how bad the palestinians are so i'm not going to get over here i got to pick a team okay both sides are actually evil in this particular case and it's again but it's right left paradigm you've got to pick a team type of deal so anyway

this is the first time since its passage the face act in 1994 that it has been used to protect a house of worship working with secretary linda mcmahon who has been a champion for you as well and harmy we have secured a 200 million dollar settlement with columbia university for violating the civil rights of jewish students

All of this is setting precedent to where you will not be able to say anything against Israel in any way, shape, or form.

This was during the height of Operation Metro's surge.

Nearly 40 people were charged in federal court for violating the FACE Act, including journalists covering the protest.

Today, those people were in a federal courtroom, and our Frankie McLister was there.

He reports from St. Paul and hears from defendant William Kelly.

There are several hearings that are happening between this week and next.

One happened on Tuesday, one was today, and the other two are next week.

I'll read to you about the FACE Act.

That basically restricts violence and intimidations targeting religious worship sites.

...

they, they just arrested f- for, for this FACE Act thing-

Mm-hmm

...

The idea that, yeah, of course, like vaguely, you know, banning harassment or what have you.

We've talked about this before in the FACE Act context, like there are already laws against.

harassment and assault and battery and trespassing and all this stuff.

You really don't need a special bubble around people to keep them safe from protesting or from education that they don't want to hear.

So they end up charging them civilly.

There's two codes under the FACE Act.

There's civil and criminal, and the criminal case is ongoing.

So basically, Harmeet Dhillon does a press conference at the DOJ headquarters.

And at one point Renee and I looked at each other and said, okay, we've done everything that we can do.

Hashem's got us, right? There's no way this is gonna go badly.

So the fact that we got the FACE Act and the fact that we're going on the offense and there's so many other, there's more legal news that will come soon, major legal news that's gonna happen very soon as we continue to go on the offense.

So I think people that are going through a crisis, don't blame God.

So this is why, as you said, Andrew, this is a really important case.

Our listeners will recall when we interviewed Sunita Dottamani, another fired prosecutor who had prosecuted the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act cases and was fired really just under this with the same letter that Maureen Comey got, which is pursuant to Article 2 of the Constitution, you're fired.

No reason, no cause.

And there are many other cases like this.

An FBI memo about traditional Catholics.

Face Act prosecutions of pro-lifers.

After Trump won a second term, his administration pursued investigations and prosecutions of political opponents.

I fear this cycle of revenge and recrimination is going to get worse before it gets better.