The contraction argument is framed as rebalancing, not abolition.
H
Herman PoppleberryHOST
13:50
The closest you get is Frank Furedi attacking the idea of 70% participation as turning universities into an extension of school.
H
Herman PoppleberryHOST
13:59
But even he isn't proposing to close undergraduate teaching.
C
CornHOST
14:03
So the answer to Daniel's direct question is that the contractionists want fewer undergraduates in low-value courses and more apprentices, but they still want universities teaching undergraduates.
We value your privacy
We use cookies to understand how you use our platform and to improve your experience. Click “Accept All” to consent, or “Decline non-essential” to opt out of non-essential cookies. Read our Privacy Policy.