False dilemma

I think the actual issue is, is a combination of things of, of course, but one of the things I think that is, um, is, um, pretty salient to me is, is that the financial aspect never enters the conversation.

And so essentially we're talking about, uh, a false choice, right? We're talking about a choice between changing your neighborhood, allowing change, and not allowing change.

But that's not actually the choice you have, right? The choice you have is allowing change or abandoning 60% of your infrastructure, right? That, that is, that is exactly what, what the actual choice is, right? And, and, and when you said like, you know, maybe single-family homes was an artificial limit, um, yes and no, right? You can h- you can have single-family homes.

You can have a neighborhood made up ex- exclusively of single-family homes.

Um, it wouldn't have been out of place 100 years ago.

Um, and, and trying to come back to that is, is gonna be messy.

But again, I think it comes back down to, again, we're giving people the wrong choice or a false choice of you can have this change or you can't, or you don't have it.

But it's not really that.

That's right.

That's the false choice I want to challenge because why don't we establish sobriety while we're understanding what the person is trying to regulate? Let's create accountability while we're addressing shame.

Let's establish boundaries while we're helping him develop healthier ways of responding to his loneliness, inadequacy, and the emotional discomfort.

And let's stop the destructive behaviors while we're becoming curious about why the behavior became so powerful in the first place.

I think that we are seeing the beginning of a pincher movement.

We are being placed into a false or potentially placed into a false dichotomy where I would like to think not to sort of poo poo or spoil the entire, you know, foundational purpose of this gathering today.

But I think we are all agreed there are absolute psyop.

aspects to the rogue AI narrative that's been presented to us and we can talk about them again I'm sure most of our audience will be familiar with them already going of course from the the latest iteration of this in the Jacob Coxon resignation this complete nobody with zero followers announces his resignation and I believe it was um I I saw this I didn't verify it but I I believe the Washington Post article about that resignation post went up 18 minutes before his tweet went out so I Yeah, anyway, I think it's pretty safe to say that there are clearly manipulated parts of this narrative that are meant to be thrusting this into our conversation right now.

Their interest is in AI going full throttle.

And so I don't think there's any sort of, you know, the only nuance is who is, which side is each individual's person bread buttered on.

And again, it creates a false dichotomy.

To me, okay, there's two things about this.

It creates an artificial tension.

But does it actually have to be a zero-sum game? Is it really an either/or scenario? Because looking at those two letters, it feels like we are being manipulated into a false dichotomy.

I can see that.

How are you visualizing the alternative?

When you cut through those woods from bootstrapping to raising capital, you are fundamentally altering the DNA of the entity.

That's true.

The versus might be a false dichotomy chronologically, but it is a very real dichotomy structurally.

Once you take external capital, you introduce an entirely new set of physics into the business.

But I think it's important to at least be open-minded as time goes on in these days that we're in, to just be aware of some of those dichotomies, because we want to be Discerning against deception and we want to be ready For the tests of this time and we don't want to follow anything that is going to lead us astray because I think like you see in the movies when you have like a Super villain and you have the hero people naturally this this Hegelian dialectic people naturally are drawn to the one that they think represents the hero or represents the good side.

And I think you've just got to be really careful in this world because there's so often this false dichotomy between left and right.

We see this political division, but also that appears in some of the agendas that we see from Luciferian side and the people that follow up, maybe the Jesuits and others that are involved in propagating some of these things.

And I just recommend just to be very careful because we know if we're a believer in Jesus Christ, we know how he returns and we it won't be a question of, is that the real Jesus or is this the real thing? Because it just is going to, there's no question left.

We're gonna miss out on this.

This article, I think, presents a false choice between hobbyist thinking and professional business podcasting.

A creator can take a podcast seriously without turning it into a full-time commercial enterprise.

Someone may produce a show with discipline.

this week was a piece called...

I put it in the doc, but it's called Why AI Pacing Has Become a False Choice.

And so what I said there is that...

The problem with the current dialogue around this is the same problem of why we can't solve sort of any of the problems that we have.