FactCheck.org

I mean, they're just perennially pretty bad at hitting Trump.

And they just give him know basically you know free advertising or whatever it's called which he's really good at he's good at getting in the media generating these controversies and then ultimately seeming vindicated because they just can't actually hit him where it hurts i will say i i saw that they were doing a little bit of a better job like if you look at factcheck.org and they look at this nebraska campaign rally i'm sure during the russia collusion era they were saying you know that these were factual claims that he was colluding with russia but on this occasion they dug deep into the context They look at his wording in previous speeches where he uses the let them take out formulation, and they conclude actually he wasn't inviting Iran to nuke Los Angeles and San Diego.

He's just speaking off the cuff and in a kind of garbled way.

Yeah, no, I do think that even the mainstream media in general, even somebody like Joe Scarborough has handled Trump better the second time around than they did the first one.

But, you know, I just looked at some...

I went by... very reputable organizations like factcheck.org, Associated Press, Reuters, and looked for obvious lies that Trump and the administration has told.

And there are huge lies in here.

I mean...

In fact, to the best of my knowledge, he had not seen it or read it or had any knowledge of it, uh, whatsoever.

In fact, factcheck.org has rated the, uh, precise trick being attempted here, associating the Social Security proposals in this document with people who did not sign it as false.

Last election, KCRA itself called out this same trick, rating a claim by the Morse campaign as false.

The reality is Congressman Kiley is opposed to raising the Social Security retirement age or cutting benefits in any way, shape, or form.

I will say I, I saw that they were doing a little bit of a better job.

Like, if you look at factcheck.org and they look at this Nebraska campaign rally, I'm sure during the Russia collusion era, they were saying, you know, that these were factual claims that he was colluding with Russia.

But on this occasion, they dug deep into the context.

They look at his wording in previous speeches where he uses the "let them take out" formulation, and they conclude actually he wasn't inviting Iran to nuke Los Angeles and San Diego.

Sure.

Um, factcheck.org says the economy regained millions of jobs lost during the coronavirus pandemic.

Regained millions of jobs lost.

That's a given.

Nobody looks at the legacy media like that, especially outlets like Reuters.

Copies of these flight logs can be seen online, uploaded by Gawker.com and FactCheck.org. Reuters found no mention of Bill Gates in the first collection of flight logs and only one instance in the second.

The log shows Bill Gates noted as a passenger on March 1st, 2013, from Teterboro Airport in New Jersey to Palm Beach International Airport, Florida, not to Little Saint James.

So that's not a big deal? It, it's only a big deal if he goes to Little Saint James? That's the only place people were abused? Breaking news, Reuters.

I can't see anything.

Factcheck.org.

Factcheck.org.

It has nothing to do with Biden.

But-