Existence

So that's just one way to think about it.

But when we think about pure existence itself, Existence is what actualizes, it gives actuality to things.

Things can potentially exist.

I'm not likely to have another child in 43, but potentially there are a lot of new things that could exist, but they don't actually exist until they come to participate in existence.

Okay, so if all that is happening now, and for sure there's a response to the Me Too movement, and if you're bringing America in the center of it, there's been like two female candidates for president in the last 10 years that has never happened in the history of the country before, and it's very surprising to this very classically religious... mindset that they have.

What end? To what end exactly? Are they trying to literally go back to nuclear family? Are they trying to go back to an Adam and Eve reality where there's men and women are the sinful ones who just ruin everything and the men are the ones who have to then suffer on behalf of women and all of society? Because part of the manosphere rhetoric is that Existence is suffering like men need to suffer that is part of men's existence that they need to just accept that like that is part That's one of the big

but it's not just pillars suffering its existence is suffering and you need to Overpower that you need to gain control you need to Fight that so you become bigger and stronger and smarter and wealthier Finances is like a right how you

fight that is through finances

Fine.

Existence pause.

Existence play.

For our first movie, we watched the 1994 Kenneth Branagh's version of Mary Shelley's Frankenstein.

And it is very, this is much more campier than I remember it to be.

No, I know.

Like with audio or video or whatnot.

Existence is past.

It surprises me that more people aren't just obsessed with understanding their existence a lot more than they are.

Okay, well, okay, Mr.

Existence, let's get a little bit deeper here then.

Let's talk about something that I've looked at.

Let's talk

So, after they are made, he is free not to continue their existence, and thus they would cease to exist, and this would be to annihilate them.

Reply to Objection 1.

Non-existence has no direct cause, for nothing is a cause except inasmuch as it has existence, and a being essentially as such is a cause of something existing.

Therefore, God cannot cause a thing to tend to non-existence, whereas a creature has this tendency of itself, since it is produced from nothing.

But indirectly, God can be the cause of things being reduced to non-existence by withdrawing his action therefrom.

would be what's now being called the botched execution in the state of Arizona of a convicted murderer.

The execution, in case you weren't following this story, took... approximately two hours, approximately two hours for the convicted killer to stop gasping and snorting and finally cease existence.

At first, the governor of Arizona, Jan Brewer, said at least he didn't suffer like the people, the families of the people he killed.

She then revised her comments later in the week.