Emergency Use Authorization

They had to discredit ivermectin because you know why, because there's a federal law.

The federal law, the Emergency Use Authorization statute says that you cannot issue, you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine i- if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that ha- that is demonstrated effective against the target illness.

So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective.

'Cause if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would've collapsed.

They had to discredit ivermectin because, you know why? Because there's a federal law.

The federal law, the Emergency Use Authorization statute says that you cannot issue, you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine i- if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that ha- that is demonstrated effective against the target illness.

So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective, 'cause if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

That's insane.

And all the ones that are approved, we don't have that same protection.

You don't have the protection of the EUA because it's gone through the full FDA process.

And so I'm, I'm learning this from the legal side on the medical side.

I'm very clearly like, this is not right.

And so medically, I'm not taking it.

Ethically, philosophically, I'm not taking it.

But legally, I don't have to take it because it's an EUA product.

I was fortunate I didn't have the direct pressure during the peak of the pressure.

They had to discredit ivermectin, because, you know, uh, because there's a federal law.

The federal law, the Emergency Use Authorization statute says that you cannot issue, you cannot issue an emergency use authorization to a vaccine i- if there is an existing medication that has been approved for any purpose that ha- that is demonstrated effective against the target illness.

So they had to destroy ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and discredit it, and they had to tell everybody it's not effective.

'Cause if they had acknowledged that it's effective in anybody, the whole $200 billion vaccine enterprise would have collapsed.

That's where I found the science.

You see, trillions were at stake with the release of the COVID-19 vaccines, and any other therapy that was found to be successful against COVID-19 would have prevented the EUA, or Emergency Use Authorization, from being implemented For allowing the vaccines to be released to the public.

So a joint effort of big pharma, the medical community, medical journals, three-letter government agencies, and the media were able to proclaim that the vaccines were safe and effective, even though we know they weren't, and that workable therapies like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were not safe or effective, when in fact they actually were.

So I mean, this was like something out of Orwell's "1984" in which the core state slogan of the ruling party said, "War is peace, freedom is slavery, ignorance is strength." You know, there was a wave of excellent independent studies and clinical findings which showed that both hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin could successfully treat COVID-19.