Embryo

In both cases, there is probably sincerity as well as simplicity.

Haeckel was so certain that the species illustrated in Embryo really are closely related and linked up that it seemed to him a small thing to simplify it by mere repetition.

Harnack is so certain that the German and Englishman are almost alike that he really risks the generalization that they are exactly alike.

He photographs, so to speak, the same fair and foolish face twice over, and calls it a remarkable resemblance between cousins.

Of course.

And then another track, the second one, Embryo, is that an African mode, like the scale that's used?

Not to my knowledge, it might be.

I was pretty much thinking about my childhood.

I don't know what animal this is.

What is it? Is that what it is? In addition to an endoderm and an ectoderm, the embryons...

Embryons? That's not a word.

I

hate

It's like

Embryo.

Oh, God.

Of course it is.

It's a very popular secular pro-life book.

It's an academic book, I believe, but it's called Embryo, a defense for human life, I believe.

And he makes the case explicitly.

He says religion is not needed in the abortion debate.

And there was one study that I have in the book where they actually, someone surveyed 5,000 biologists asking them, when does human life begin? And it's peer reviewed, and they found that 96% of them affirmed the fertilization view.

that human life begins at fertilization because it's that obvious.

Embryology textbooks will repeat that claim over and over.

So the science chapter is one, but I want to go back.

He wrote a great book that I have back there.

I think it's called The Embryo or something to that effect.

It's a fantastic read, and I cite him a lot in support of the personhood of the unborn.

Mm-hmm.