Early English Text Society

From the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgements which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the 11th to the 13th centuries, it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period, two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient, orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments, which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient, orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments, which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient, orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the 11th to the 13th centuries it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgements, which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments, which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient, orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient, orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely-treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

From the eleventh to the thirteenth centuries, it seems to have been almost classic, and during that period two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient, orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.

And during that period, two full metrical versions, one in Norman French and the other in English, were written, besides many other short versions and abridgments which still exist.

These are given exhaustively by Professor Skeat in his edition of the English poem for the Early English Text Society, and it is needless to do more than refer to them here as the sources from which this story is gathered.

These versions differ most materially from one another in names and incidents, while yet preserving the main outlines of the whole history.

It is evident that there has been a far more ancient orally preserved tradition, which has been the original of the freely treated poems and concise prose statements of the legend which we have.